Cyberyeti, on 2012-April-02, 02:55, said:
The first one was interesting.
I'm not sure what S envisions N having for his "suit setting" bid. It's fine when he has Jx, but what if he has x or void ? Also what does N envision S holding ? Is AK10xxxxx sufficient to show Q ?
Our auction was 2♣-2♠-3♦-3♥-4♦-5N(GSF)-7♦
A jump to 4♦ would have shown a solid suit, so partner was aware my suit was not solid, but was very long.
I don't think a suit setting bid carries the implication that our suit is (totally) solid, just that we definitely want to play in that suit. After a 2d bid I think 4d is completely normal, after a 2s response, then you might want to go low as partner can have AQxxxx(x) or similar, and it might be right to play in spades. The problem with reserving these bids for solid suits is that if can make it much more difficult for a cue bidding auction to start when you are dealt "only" AQJ to nine for your suit, and really just care about the other suits, as here.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper