Page 1 of 1
Unanimous? slam lead
#1
Posted 2011-February-20, 19:26
Don't argue with a fool. He has a rested brain
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
#2
Posted 2011-February-20, 22:18
I lack the imagination for a C lead, which may well blow a trick. I guess the C lead was right else you would not have posted this.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#3
Posted 2011-February-20, 22:25
Um, I lead my partner's suit.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#4
Posted 2011-February-20, 23:00
I think they are ready for heart lead. Cynical soul that I am...planning to cash first two clubs.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2011-February-20, 23:11
If you have the specific agreement that a double of 5H means "I changed my mind, I don't want a heart led," then you have a reason to go ahead and lead a heart.
Lacking that agreement (and even with my regular partner I dont have that agreement) I voted for a club.
Lacking that agreement (and even with my regular partner I dont have that agreement) I voted for a club.
#6
Posted 2011-February-20, 23:23
Siegmund, on 2011-February-20, 23:11, said:
If you have the specific agreement that a double of 5H means "I changed my mind, I don't want a heart led," then you have a reason to go ahead and lead a heart.
Lacking that agreement (and even with my regular partner I dont have that agreement) I voted for a club.
Lacking that agreement (and even with my regular partner I dont have that agreement) I voted for a club.
yeh, well I have that agreement but am still not convinced pard would double with the heart king Jack and the club ace
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#7
Posted 2011-February-21, 01:42
Club K. They are apparently off an ace, or the Q of trump, or they would have probably bid 5N; I want to establish our 2nd trick before they knock out the keycard they are missing.
Edit: I'm an idiot, that may not be what's happening at all. I'm still leading club K.
Edit: I'm an idiot, that may not be what's happening at all. I'm still leading club K.
Chris Gibson
#8
Posted 2011-February-21, 04:18
I have the agreement described where X of 5♥ would mean don't lead my suit, although partner might forget if he thinks they are heading to a club slam, but a nt slam has to seem possible.
I'd lead the ♥. I'm not sure it should matter much since I can imagine the 6♦ bidder has something like 1174 or 1183 or Kx=173, obviously with diamonds headed by the AKQ and on these holdings neither a heart lead nor a club lead ought to be terrible.
I'd lead the ♥. I'm not sure it should matter much since I can imagine the 6♦ bidder has something like 1174 or 1183 or Kx=173, obviously with diamonds headed by the AKQ and on these holdings neither a heart lead nor a club lead ought to be terrible.
#9
Posted 2011-February-21, 04:28
I don't have too much imagination, but seeing partner with ♥KJ and dummy with ♣AJxx(x), ♥xx(x) is not that hard
#10
Posted 2011-February-21, 07:04
For a club lead to be necessary, declarer must be able to throw his clubs on spades, but not be able to throw his spades on clubs. It's hard to picture a layout where that's happening.
I'd lead a heart.
I'd lead a heart.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Page 1 of 1

Help
