mike777, on Oct 29 2005, 12:02 PM, said:
I was serious, not joking. As I said I would not have found most of these bids at the table. I am glad Rebound posted this so I can see the thought process of most of the BBO players and forum posters who do bid like this.
2h=no prefer pass
2s=no prefer 3s weak
3h=no prefer 3d
4s=no never thought of trying to steal vul vs nv against a game that I am not sure will make.
5h=no again never entered my mind
2s=Michaels over 1s=no again and bidding 4h after michaels 1s=2s=3s=4h again no.
Rebound's bidding may very well be winning bridge but almost all of these bids never entered my thought process. Rebound certainly won this hand big. Again thanks for posting. I would love to see more "over the shoulder" bidding and play problems.
I never doubted your seriousness, however, I am interested in the reasoning behind some of your choices. For example, regarding the West hand, I feel applying the expression 5-5 come alive is apt. Whether you feel the hand is too good for micheals and choose 2
♥ instead, I feel a call of some kind is appropriate. Why pass?
Regarding partner's 2
♠ call over 2
♥, I agree 3
♠ is better, incidentally, but you seem to forget I am not responsible for any calls other than 1
♠ and 4
♠. My second question also had little to do with whether you agree with the early part of the auction. It was, were the auction to go 1
♠-2
♠-3
♠-4
♥ to you what would you do?
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
Auction: 1♠-(2♥)-2♠-(3♥)
-4♠-(5♥)-X-ap