Spot the mistake(s) by declarer/defender beg/intermediate only
#21
Posted 2005-April-15, 03:49
#22
Posted 2005-April-15, 05:17
#23
Posted 2005-April-15, 07:50
#24
Posted 2005-April-15, 08:19
daswallow, on Apr 15 2005, 08:50 AM, said:
You may get away with this, but reversing the order is better in case West ruffs the first or second spade. Then he has a trump exit.
Roland
#25
Posted 2005-April-15, 09:18
With the "stronger" (the 5 instead of the 4) club holding, its more on an int / adv level, with the trump unblock by West.
By the way, even with the stronger clubs, you are still making if both red kings are in the same hand.
And, with the actual hand, you need to "shrug" as you play the 2nd trump. Assuming west is asleep, then 3rd and 4th trump, A-K♠ and advance the greek gift.
#26
Posted 2005-April-15, 10:13
I f this is wrong its because i havent got my glasses on lol
#27
Posted 2005-April-17, 13:05
Simple.
No need for an endplay.
#28
Posted 2005-April-17, 13:14
jdulmage, on Apr 17 2005, 08:05 PM, said:
Simple.
No need for an endplay.
And what if East has ♦K and plays you back a low ♥ to west's King? Why choose a 75% line if you have a 100% line?
Btw, your line IS an endplay...
#29
Posted 2005-April-17, 13:54
#2 - I meant to say "no need for *THAT* endplay"
Done attempting to look smart?
#30
Posted 2005-April-18, 09:18
jdulmage, on Apr 17 2005, 02:05 PM, said:
Simple.
No need for an endplay.
Sorry. Your line fails, for west holds a singleton spade. He ruffs your ♠K and exits with a trump.
btw, the question was to spot declarer's mistakes, not to come up with a double dummy line, knowing what key cards west holds.
So after 3 cards are played to trick one, what _should_ the declarer have done (single dummy), note that at this juncture, the declarer does not know if West holds the ♦K.

Help
