[lycier]

I don't know the reasons I like to study Gib. I remember Bbradley62 said earlier Gibs probably make different lead in the same hand with different players.
Really?

1- Lead ♠2

---

2- lead ♣3

---

3- lead ♠2

---

4- lead ♦2

---

5- lead ♦J

---

6- lead ♦2

---

7- lead ♦2

---

8- lead ♣4

---

9- lead ♣4

---

10- lead ♣4

---

11- W Gib lead ♦5

---

12- W Gib lead ♦5

---

13- W Gib lead ♠4

---

14- W Gib lead ♠4

---

15- lead ♣4

---

16- lead ♣4

---

17- lead ♣4

---

Just saying.

[manudude03]

Different auctions will usually mean different leads. There's not really a whole lot wrong with that. As for the earlier versions theory, you could post a million hands and it wouldn't (dis)prove it. You would need to find out which player was using which version of GiB.

[Bbradley62]

I'm quite sure I didn't say different leads with different players. I would have said that in MBC there are several different versions of GIB, and even when you have the same version and the same auction they have different "seed" numbers for simulating holdings, so they might make different choices even with the same version and same auction.

[lycier]

Bbradley62, on 2016-March-12, 11:13, said:

I'm quite sure I didn't say different leads with different players.

Sorry
I have remembered incorrectly。