PassedOut, on 2016-July-19, 07:51, said:
Her speechwriters are to blame, but there should have been some oversight. The chaos in the Trump campaign is telling.
shyams, on 2016-July-19, 08:00, said:
Does her speech really matter? Melania will (technically) play no role in administration, if Trump were to become president. What she says is IMO irrelevant to the outcome of the elections.
Isn't PassedOut's point why it matters? If she'd written the speech herself, then it wouldn't matter because she's wouldn't be part of the administration (although there have been plenty of First Ladies who had significant influence on their husbands, e.g. Nancy Reagan and Eleanor Roosevelt, but I doubt Melania has such plans).
But her speechwriters are part of Donald's campaign team, and what they do reflects on Donald. Some will likely be part of his administration should he win, so they'll have a part in his policy-making. They're not as irrelevant as Melania.
Obama once was caught making a speech that copied from former MA Governor Deval Patrick. When this was noticed, he owned up to it and apologized for not attributing the source, he didn't claim it was a conspiracy by his political opponents.
Harry Truman was famous for saying "The Buck Stops Here". When someone on your team commits a faux pas, it's your fault. Hillary is responsible for her IT people's sloppy handling of the emails, and Trump is responsible for the content of Melania's speech.