Posted 2015-January-13, 13:24
Luckily, we stumbled into the right contract
1 on this one:
I can't think of a better way for responder to show a 6-5 hand, so maybe 3
♠ should indeed show 6 spades?
In any case 2NT got me pretty excited. I still wonder whether that was justified, but it worked out in this case.
1) Well, actually we wrongsided it, guess we'd better rethink those transfers.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell