Last train or sign off?
#1
Posted 2014-November-02, 03:13
2C P 4C P
2C = Drury (one-way)
[Edit 4C = splinter]
QT9x
Q9x
K
KT9xx
#2
Posted 2014-November-02, 04:58
With a hand like Ax AKJxxx AJxx x, p will have to move if you bid last train and opposite your hand the five level might not be safe.
#3
Posted 2014-November-02, 05:03
The way I play Drury is that 3♥ by partner would have been a slam try. That means that 4♣ was not a general cue, but a splinter. In that case 4♦ would not be last train in my vocabulary, but a genuine diamond cue. I would bid 4♦.
If 4♣ would not be a splinter, but a cue, it would be absurd to bid a last train 4♦ since we don't have the spade control that partner denied.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#4
Posted 2014-November-02, 05:07
Trinidad, on 2014-November-02, 05:03, said:
The way I play Drury is that 3♥ by partner would have been a slam try. That means that 4♣ was not a general cue, but a splinter. In that case 4♦ would not be last train in my vocabulary, but a genuine diamond cue. I would bid 4♦.
If 4♣ would not be a splinter, but a cue, it would be absurd to bid a last train 4♦ since we don't have the spade control that partner denied.
Rik
I would guess that 4♣ is a splinter. Why does this mean that 4♦ cannot be last train? There is one bid between signing off and the current level so 4♦ is just a general slam try neither denying or confirming a ♠ control. That's the way I play it anyway.
#5
Posted 2014-November-02, 05:11
ETA - didn't register 4♦ was last train. Not my finest morning. Anyway, given that, I feel like it's even worse than bidding it as a cue would have been.
#6
Posted 2014-November-02, 05:16
#9
Posted 2014-November-02, 16:55
#11
Posted 2014-November-03, 12:01
we do not know why they chose that method but our hand got 30% worse when p
shows up short in clubs. While the ability to potentially ruff diamonds keeps
this from being a hopeless hand it is still a poor hand overall given your
p choice of bids.
It seems far better to just bid
4h
letting your p know about your hand downgrade and they can continue further if
they wish. As an aside your hand construction seems to indicate that one pitch
on the club K is unlikely to ever be the slam going trick. Switch your dia K
and spade Q around and the club K might still have slam potential (even then
it is at best 5050).
#13
Posted 2014-November-03, 17:09
MickyB, on 2014-November-02, 03:13, said:
2C P 4C P
2C = Drury (one-way)
[Edit 4C = splinter]
QT9x
Q9x
K
KT9xx
yunling, on 2014-November-02, 06:31, said:
whereagles, on 2014-November-02, 15:30, said:
I disagree. This hand is much better than something like Qxx Qxx Jxx KQxx.
The hand given could be just what partner is looking for: the spade suit could be a good filler opposite length, The diamond holding could take care of partner's losers in the suit. On a good day, even the ♣K might provide a useful pitch.
Bearing in mind that with a perfect fitting hand I should be forcing to slam, I should show vague signs of encouragement when my hand is OK, particularly when I'm not committing our side above the 4-level. I bid 4♦.
#14
Posted 2014-November-03, 17:43
#15
Posted 2014-November-03, 19:02
whereagles, on 2014-November-03, 17:09, said:
jallerton, on 2014-November-03, 17:09, said:
The hand given could be just what partner is looking for: the spade suit could be a good filler opposite length, The diamond holding could take care of partner's losers in the suit. On a good day, even the ♣K might provide a useful pitch.
Bearing in mind that with a perfect fitting hand I should be forcing to slam, I should show vague signs of encouragement when my hand is OK, particularly when I'm not committing our side above the 4-level. I bid 4♦.
It was the worst possible which was worth a 2♣ drury call.
Qxx Qxx Jxx KQxx
That's a 2♥ bid.
#16
Posted 2014-November-03, 19:33
jogs, on 2014-November-03, 19:02, said:
Qxx Qxx Jxx KQxx
That's a 2♥ bid.
MickyB is probably opening balanced 11 counts.
I will never understand why so many think it's best to have a range of 4-10 for 1H-2H, and 9.5-10.5 (or 9.5-11 if you are a more solid opener) for 1H-2C.
We have a fit, and we have two more steps below the 2-level. We can manage with a range of good 8 - submin opener.
#17
Posted 2014-November-04, 01:26
#19
Posted 2014-November-04, 15:04
I signed off at the table without much thought, we missed a decent slam when partner held AJxx AJT8x AQJx void. A player I respect suggested I was worth 4D. I was unsure - 7 hcp outside of clubs is ok, but stiff king must be a fair bit worse than Kx here.
#20
Posted 2014-November-04, 15:14