BBO Discussion Forums: GIB and me,who is at fault? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

GIB and me,who is at fault?

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2014-April-05, 00:46



1- I wonder why GIB N pass decent 4 card support after my double ?
2- After 3,I am wondering how to take next action? pass is a best option?
0

#2 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2014-April-05, 05:24

Gib was led astray by system. Gib believes your second double shows "biddable hearts", in which case its pass is slightly less bizarre. Until Gib decides to improve his system, you should probably grit your teeth and pass.
0

#3 User is offline   1eyedjack 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,575
  • Joined: 2004-March-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-April-05, 06:27

 nige1, on 2014-April-05, 05:24, said:

Until Gib decides to improve his system, you should probably grit your teeth and pass.


Would you not want to pass anyway?
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.

Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mPosted ImagesPosted ImagetPosted Imager-mPosted ImagendPosted Imageing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.

"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"

"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
0

#4 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2014-April-16, 08:20

When GIB shows supperaccept, 4 trumps in transferred major, it does only with 17HCP, and using 2NT with 4333 and if it's max with doubleton it bids it almost natually.

The exception here would be doubleton in hearts, which GIB would show with 3.

Idea in this sequence is to keep retransfer always possible so responder to keep 1NT opener declarer.

Here North has 16HCP and therefore cannot bid supperaccept with 4 cards.

#5 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-April-16, 11:30

 georgi, on 2014-April-16, 08:20, said:

Here North has 16HCP and therefore cannot bid supperaccept with 4 cards.

He didn't say North should superaccept. He said it should pull the double to spades, because of the known 9-card fit.

But I wouldn't double with the South hand. If you hadn't doubled, North might have bid 3. Basic bots would, because the book bid uses the LOTT; advanced bots don't, probably because simulations show that KQ of the opponent's suit provide more defensive than offensive value.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users