BBO Discussion Forums: A passive lead? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A passive lead?

#1 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-28, 18:19

IMPs, your side only vulnerable. Opps playing 4cM, weak NT bid unopposed 1C-1S; 2C-2D; 2NT-out.

What do you lead from:

Jxx
AJxx
A10x
5xx

There will be a follow-up post.

ahydra
0

#2 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2013-October-28, 20:41

jack of spades
0

#3 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2013-October-29, 06:16

A spade looks clear. Not sure if there is any gain from leading the jack. Even if North has KTxx and South xx, a small spade will beat it when we can.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#4 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2013-October-29, 06:34

I like J of S, especially if 2D was natural.
0

#5 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,250
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-29, 13:19

Hearts.

Declarer is 5422, maybe 6322.

Clubs is out, spade is out, they will have a 52 fit, spades are breaking,
this leaves diamonds and hearts, I go with hearts.

I am assuming 2D 3rd suit forcing, if it is natural, diamonds is out as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is offline   akwoo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,376
  • Joined: 2010-November-21

Posted 2013-October-29, 15:38

IMPs, I lead a small heart. They can probably set up long clubs if you go too passive. It might very well give up a heart trick, but might also set up the hearts before clubs run. If the contract goes down on a spade lead, it will likely also go down on a later spade lead; there's no urgency to it.

MPs, I give up on beating the contract, go ultra-passive, and lead a small club. Yes it might finesse partner, but declarer is going to take the finesse anyway, and I don't think he'll be that short on entries to dummy.
0

#7 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,092
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2013-October-30, 04:56

T

Not sure whether that counts as active or passive.

Rainer Herrmann
0

#8 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-October-30, 05:31

I would lead a heart. But if I would lead one of dummy's suits, I would pick his second suit, diamonds with the most discouraging card that I can play: the ten.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#9 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-30, 05:47

Interesting range of responses. :)

At the table I figured they would be fairly tight on points for 2NT and led a small club, hoping to go passive. If partner has one honour in spades we have their suits controlled so they may struggle to establish any tricks outside of clubs.

Dummy hit with A10xxx 10x KJxxx 8. Partner had K10x of clubs and played the K on the first round. Do you agree with that play?

ahydra
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,250
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-October-30, 09:01

The King of Clubs is ..., the 10 is a lot better.
From the bidding you know, that declarer has 5+ clubs, i.e. he will have at least
a length stopper with an honor, so ducking 1 round, and finessing the 3rd round will
establish the suit for us, if the suit can be established.
And of course, if the club lead, was worst of evil, the king is giving up a trick,
for no good reason.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2013-October-30, 09:20

 ahydra, on 2013-October-30, 05:47, said:

Partner had K10x of clubs and played the K on the first round. Do you agree with that play?


it depends which one you led. even if you play 2nd highest from bad suits, you should lead high here.

btw i think a club lead is very poor. declarer normally has 6 - he's likely to have enough tricks if he can establish them. you go passive on hands where you think the hand lies badly for declarer. xxx over the clubs doesn't constitute lying badly.
1

#12 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2013-October-30, 09:33

 wank, on 2013-October-30, 09:20, said:

it depends which one you led. even if you play 2nd highest from bad suits, you should lead high here.


I led the 3 (2nd highest). Pity I didn't have 87x or something.

ahydra
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users