BBO Discussion Forums: Win or Duck - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Win or Duck A nasty guess

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,444
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2013-August-10, 16:38


Partner leads the ten of diamonds (high from doubleton, usually third from Txx), and dummy plays the king. Over to you?

Spingold Quarterfinal; IMP scoring. If it helps, declarer is Madala, partnering Bocchi, and in the other room Gromov will be on lead against Hamman, presumably against the same contract, and he leads low from a doubleton. This is board six of segment 1 of a 64 board match, and the early boards do not feel great for you.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-August-10, 16:44

We cannot defeat unless partner has 2 spades, for partner to have 2 spades declarer has to be 6-4, if declarer had 4 clubs he would be void in hearts which is unlikely, so win the ace and return one.

There is also another reason, if declarer has Kx we need to score the ruff now or declarer might play from the top.

Also leading A form Ax 10x Axxx(x) is an option.
0

#3 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,444
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2013-August-12, 05:13

View PostFluffy, on 2013-August-10, 16:44, said:

We cannot defeat unless partner has 2 spades, for partner to have 2 spades declarer has to be 6-4, if declarer had 4 clubs he would be void in hearts which is unlikely, so win the ace and return one.

There is also another reason, if declarer has Kx we need to score the ruff now or declarer might play from the top.

Also leading A form Ax 10x Axxx(x) is an option.

I agree with you. In one room, on a similar auction, the T could not be a doubleton and the defender rose and gave his partner a ruff. In this room the defender ducked, which surprised me, coming as it did from a world-class player. It would seem that in such situations it is always right to play partner for a singleton. Playing him for a doubleton also requires him, as you suggest, to have Ax as a minimum. Another small problem is that partner cannot always tell you have the ace of diamonds.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#4 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-August-12, 09:59

It's fair to say Madala did not have a standard 3 opening. That said, East made a nullo defence (winning and switching to a trump).
0

#5 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,444
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2013-August-12, 14:08

View PostPhilKing, on 2013-August-12, 09:59, said:

It's fair to say Madala did not have a standard 3 opening. That said, East made a nullo defence (winning and switching to a trump).

While I was watching, he ducked, playing the 8, and this accords with the Vugraph archive. There was no longer any defence, and I think declarer claimed shortly after knocking out the ace of spades. But I agree re the non-standard opener!
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users