Looking at the EW hands it doesn't seem unreasonable to reach 6♥. If the auction starts (2S) - Dbl, North bids 4S.
What should happen?
#1
Posted 2013-April-11, 16:41
Looking at the EW hands it doesn't seem unreasonable to reach 6♥. If the auction starts (2S) - Dbl, North bids 4S.
#2
Posted 2013-April-11, 22:00
2♠ - 3♣ - 3♠ - dbl (takeout)
4♥
ps. did I mention that I HATE double with the west hand?
What is baby oil made of?
#3
Posted 2013-April-11, 23:15
(2♠) - 4♣ - pass - 4♥
all pass
Although East should make a slam try.. and slam is clearly not bad.. .needs trumps 22 or singleton Queen, or club hook on, so percentage wise, I think I would want to be in slam unless I could see all four hands.
#4
Posted 2013-April-12, 02:25
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2013-April-12, 04:58
North having KJ9xx clubs has no reason to overpreempt and bids 3♠
East doubles obviously
West is close but I think he is worth 5♥
East has to make a dificult final decision.
#6
Posted 2013-April-12, 05:56
Fluffy, on 2013-April-12, 04:58, said:
North having KJ9xx clubs has no reason to overpreempt and bids 3♠
East doubles obviously
West is close but I think he is worth 5♥
East has to make a dificult final decision.
This auction, but with East passing 5♥ for sure. West can't have more.
I don't hate double by West over 2♥. Over the nightmare sequence, I would adopt "operation scramble" - X-2N-3♣-3♦-3♥, should show this pattern and approximate point count. I am not putting this hand down in 3♦!
Double might get me to the bad 6♥:
X 4♥
5♥(asking East for spade control AND a decent hand) 6♥
#7
Posted 2013-April-12, 06:27
Fluffy, on 2013-April-12, 04:58, said:
I don't really agree and to be honest I would always shoot 4♠ at these colours. The opps rate to have a 9 card ♥ fit and game values. Why do you want to give them room to find it? And if they bid to 4♥ you're not too confident of setting it - you might want to bid 4♠ and will feel silly for not bidding it immediately.
Anyway thanks for the replies. I am coming to like the idea of bidding 4♣ on this hand more and more - not only does it get my hand off my chest but it also ups the frequency of the bid if I can have 5-4.
I held the West cards on this deal and chose dbl worrying that after (2♠)-3♣-(4♠)-Pass-(Pass)-Double would not get my hand across. We had a disaster on this deal (below).
Quite a corker - which was the worst call? This was pickup on BBO so be gentle!
#8
Posted 2013-April-12, 06:43
5♥ - I understand it. I would prefer 4NT followed by 5♦(reds) which would suggest to West his clubs were no use or 4NT followed by 5♥ as my weaker 5♥ bid (not available to pick up partnership).
6♥ - reasonable.
Pass - wrong, and definitely the worst call, but people feel impelled do this in order to show the spade control. However, if partner held ♥AKQ ♦A ♣AK he would have bid 5NT as a grand slam try lacking a spade control. I guess this was not available in a pick-up partnership of course.
7♣ - wrong, but not ridiculous. Grand is bound to have some play.
#9
Posted 2013-April-12, 08:05
#10
Posted 2013-April-13, 05:24
#11
Posted 2013-April-14, 22:57
At This point, you don't know if your slam was making, you don't know if your making grand but you can be very sure they are not making 6♠
Just double and take the plus, if they've found a good sacrifice, congratulate them and move on.
Effectively they've guessed with 6♠ and even if the forcing pass shows first round control, you just don't have enough info to reliably bid the grand.
#12
Posted 2013-April-15, 04:15
Free, on 2013-April-13, 05:24, said:
Perhaps they were hoping the opps would play there if they kept quiet?

Help
