BBO Discussion Forums: 实用首攻：首攻Ace要态度，首攻K要张数！ - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

实用首攻：首攻Ace要态度，首攻K要张数！

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-February-04, 19:36

这是一个非常有用的广泛应用技术！
这就是著名的：

The A for Attitude, King for Kount ！


首攻Ace要态度，首攻K要张数！



于是问题来了，敌方定约4H，同伴首攻一门边花的Ace或K两种情况时，你持有：

1-Qx
2-QJ
3-QJX
4-QJxx

现在该如何垫牌呢？
0

#2 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-February-04, 23:52

有意思的桥牌，有意思的英语，有意思的桥牌英语。
请问这个Kount不是Count吗?
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-February-04, 23:54

没错的，是count的随声附和的谐音字。也是桥牌英语所特有一种情况。
0

#4 User is offline   zyp163 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 443
  • Joined: 2012-July-16

Posted 2013-February-05, 03:41

许多约定卡上都定义为针对NT的。为什么？
0

#5 User is offline   3ntmk 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 190
  • Joined: 2012-May-17

Posted 2013-February-05, 06:20

思考如下：

STD A vs NT K vs NT A vs T K vs T

1-Qx Q - x x
2-QJ Q Q Q Q
3-QJX Q x Q x
4-QJxx Q Q Q Q
0

#6 User is offline   3ntmk 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 190
  • Joined: 2012-May-17

Posted 2013-February-05, 06:22

STD A vs NT K vs NT A vs T K vs T
　 　 　 　 　
1-Qx Q - x x
2-QJ Q Q Q Q
3-QJX Q x Q x
4-QJxx Q Q Q Q
0

#7 User is offline   nbxkh 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 371
  • Joined: 2013-July-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:zhejiang china

Posted 2013-July-25, 02:14

View Post3ntmk, on 2013-February-05, 06:20, said:

思考如下：

STD A vs NT K vs NT A vs T K vs T

1-Qx Q - x x
2-QJ Q Q Q Q
3-QJX Q x Q x
4-QJxx Q Q Q Q

这个板书看了头晕 :D
0

#8 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2013-July-25, 06:02

这个问题有意思----
无将首攻A要解封肯定垫大牌Q；无将攻K，下面无Q，何意？AK攻K吗？
有将首攻A可能是A带头3张以上，下面无K，那就打X表示欢迎呗；攻K上面有A或下面有Q，但本题肯定是前者有Ａ那么１随Ｑ，２随Ｑ，３随Ｘ，４随Ｘ。
0

#9 User is offline   haikuo 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 380
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2013-August-06, 20:37

这个信号我真的还没理解，主要是攻出无将定约要PD尽可能解封还是别的目的？
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users