BBO Discussion Forums: advanced bot diffferent contract? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

advanced bot diffferent contract? jump inv rebid responder

#1 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,155
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2012-May-21, 01:49



GIB at a lot of tables (presumably basic bots?) contrived this strange auction to reach the vastly inferior 4d making 5. Whereas the advanced bot at my table simply bid 4h over 3h, which is more normal.

What causes the difference, better simulations, combined with bad book definitions?

The 3h bid says "4+ H", clearly an error, should be 6+. And the 4h bid at my table supposedly promises 3h, while it should probably be 2-3 hearts.
0

#2 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2012-May-21, 04:24

View PostStephen Tu, on 2012-May-21, 01:49, said:



GIB at a lot of tables (presumably basic bots?) contrived this strange auction to reach the vastly inferior 4d making 5. Whereas the advanced bot at my table simply bid 4h over 3h, which is more normal.

What causes the difference, better simulations, combined with bad book definitions?

The 3h bid says "4+ H", clearly an error, should be 6+. And the 4h bid at my table supposedly promises 3h, while it should probably be 2-3 hearts.

And the 3H should have an upper limit of 14 TP or 14 HP (or something like that) as fourth suit forcing was bypassed not 10 TP+.
0

#3 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2012-June-02, 16:18

There was a bug. Fixed now.

So this will show invitation 6+ and 10-12TP.

Therefore West could consider pass or raise to 4.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users