passable or cue?
#1
Posted 2012-April-12, 10:48
1H-2D
3D-3S (Edit: changed typo 2D to 3D)
3NT-4H
1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D
#2
Posted 2012-April-12, 11:08
ahydra
#3
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:21
(That was what South told me)
#4
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:26
- billw55
#5
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:36
lalldonn, on 2012-April-12, 12:26, said:
I didn't get support at the bar. Happy I get it her from our star
#6
Posted 2012-April-12, 14:28
kgr, on 2012-April-12, 10:48, said:
1H-2D
2D-3S
3NT-4H
1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D
How long have you been at the bar?
What is 3S after the insufficient 2D?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"The dog that didn't bark"
"Please get your heads out of the clouds and see that there are many ways to play bridge and even though you think your is the only way mine is actually better."
#7
Posted 2012-April-12, 16:05
#8
Posted 2012-April-12, 20:19
I remember a bunch of posts in the past where jdonn played a whole lot of 4M bids as non-forcing slam invitations / encouraging COGs where it wouldn't have occurred to me to do it that way. It makes quite a bit of sense here, but isn't what I'd assume without discussion.
#9
Posted 2012-April-19, 08:14
#10
Posted 2012-April-19, 23:12
Zelandakh, on 2012-April-19, 08:14, said:
If I had agreed ♥ with a 3♥ rebid, I would think my 4♥ a game suggestion.
I assume you meant that after the original auction 4♥ would be defined as you stated.
#11
Posted 2012-April-20, 00:50
BillPatch, on 2012-April-19, 23:12, said:
That is correct. I was answering the two points raised by the OP, that he did not know what a 3♥ rebid would have been and what 4♥ should be on the 3rd round. As far as I am aware the auction 1♥ - 2♦; 3♦ - 3♥; 4♥ was never raised but yes, I would agree with your interpretation of it, a minimum opener unexcited by the double-fit.

Help
