Page 1 of 1
lead problem
#2
Posted 2012-March-27, 17:55
I'd just lead a normal count card in spades (rather than an honor, so that if there's a stiff in dummy maybe declarer won't be able to place the spade honors and will misguess the clubs).
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#3
Posted 2012-March-28, 00:45
I'd lead a heart. I actually think there's good merit to all 3 of them--for different reasons.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#4
Posted 2012-March-28, 02:51
The chance that heart tricks are vanishing looks greater then the chance that spade tricks are even avaiable. So I try the systemic hearts.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2012-March-28, 16:36
I look at my watch. If the seconds are 0-29 I will play ♣Q on first round. If 30-59 I will play ♣J on first round. OK, now I lead, uhm.... a heart?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2012-March-28, 16:57
I would lead a trump. No strong feeling particularly, but it seems like they might just not have enough tricks. I mean they both took NF actions at the 3 level (3C, passing 3S) so I think partner might have a pretty decent hand.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#7
Posted 2012-March-29, 00:48
mgoetze, on 2012-March-28, 16:36, said:
I look at my watch. If the seconds are 0-29 I will play ♣Q on first round. If 30-59 I will play ♣J on first round. OK, now I lead, uhm.... a heart?
I've wondered if using a watch as a randomizing device is legal.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#8
Posted 2012-March-29, 01:33
What a tell though - if oppo knows you
Edit: why not use if the board number is even or odd to? Could also use if you or opps are vul or not. Even better as the board will be infront of you. Or low if even and vul or odd and not vul
Edit: why not use if the board number is even or odd to? Could also use if you or opps are vul or not. Even better as the board will be infront of you. Or low if even and vul or odd and not vul
#9
Posted 2012-March-29, 02:15
#10
Posted 2012-March-29, 02:18
spade jack is not good enough, partner wins ♠K and afraid of declarer having ♠Qxx switched to ♥K. ♠2 is the card that beats the contract.
#11
Posted 2012-March-29, 07:24
I think you should get a better partner. He was playing you for something like J10xx xxx Jxxx Qx. That doesn't look like a 2♠ bid to me.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Page 1 of 1