Play!
#1
Posted 2011-December-02, 11:54
Many declarers when ostensibly asking dummy to follow suit with the smallest card available, will say, simply, "Play!"
I don't want to be a jailhouse lawyer by insisting that the declarer designate specifically which card to play - I'm new at the club, after all - but I wonder if the imperative "Play!" might violate the rules requiring declarer to specify the cards played by dummy.
(Of course, there was also the gentleman who would, as dummy, play the cards without declarer asking him to do anything; I understand that that partnership has since disbanded.)
Thanks!
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
#2
Posted 2011-December-02, 12:57
Of course, playing cards without declarer saying anything is an infraction.
-gwnn
#3
Posted 2011-December-02, 13:12
S2000magic, on 2011-December-02, 11:54, said:
Law 46B2 said:
#4
Posted 2011-December-02, 13:49
It also gives the ones who use it the chance to say "the ACE" after dummy's LHO has already followed with a card which would have won the trick. We learn to wait for a card to be detached from dummy and clearly played after being burned on that.
#5
Posted 2011-December-02, 17:58
The first time I heard "play", it sounded to me more like "play anything" than "play low". It still sounds that way, but I've learned that declarers don't mean it that way. Since the modern way seems to be to follow Humpty Dumpty ("words mean what I want them to mean, neither more nor less") I suppose we have to live with it.
Note that Law 46B does not describe correct procedure. It describes what to do when declarer fails to follow the correct procedure (described in Law 45B and Law 46A.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#6
Posted 2011-December-02, 18:34
blackshoe, on 2011-December-02, 17:58, said:
To my ear, it also sounds a bit rude (as if declarer can't be bothered with explaining his desires fully to his partner). Frankly, it sounds worst when it's perpetrated by people whom I know to be - otherwise - the soul of politeness.
I have a similar aversion to such phrases as, "Go up!" Is that easier, cooler, or whateverer than saying, "Ace, please"?
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
#7
Posted 2011-December-02, 18:42
S2000magic, on 2011-December-02, 18:34, said:
In this specific case, I try to say anything except "Ace" or "Ace, please" etc. because of the enunciating issue with "eight". I'll say "Big" or "Up" or even just motion vehemently up with my thumb, but I find all of those easier to understand than "Ace".
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#8
Posted 2011-December-02, 18:49
S2000magic, on 2011-December-02, 18:34, said:
I have a similar aversion to such phrases as, "Go up!" Is that easier, cooler, or whateverer than saying, "Ace, please"?
Do the gentlemen at your club wear jackets and ties to the game? And the ladies wear pearls? And everyone sips tea with their pinkies extended? If not, please get a grip.
#9
Posted 2011-December-02, 18:53
#10
Posted 2011-December-02, 19:10
Bbradley62, on 2011-December-02, 18:49, said:
I'll give it a shot.
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
#11
Posted 2011-December-02, 19:13
BunnyGo, on 2011-December-02, 18:42, said:
Not unlike someone with, say, a Bostonian accent choosing to say "No bid" instead of "Pass" because of the chance that "Pass" will sound too much like "Heart".
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
#12
Posted 2011-December-03, 01:57
blackshoe, on 2011-December-02, 17:58, said:
The first time I heard "play", it sounded to me more like "play anything" than "play low". It still sounds that way, but I've learned that declarers don't mean it that way.
It also just sounds weird, and doesn't make sense as a way of calling a card. Of course dummy is going to "play" something, because it is his turn; the question is which card. Also it's not easier or quicker than "low".
#13
Posted 2011-December-03, 02:27
#14
Posted 2011-December-05, 13:14
In my experience, as most others here have confirmed, the intent of declarer is practically always 46B1c. So based on how common this practice is, I think we can conclude that this is a "word of like meaning" to "low". Also, this practice is generally only used when dummy is following suit (can anyone recall a counterexample?), so the suit is designated implicitly, even though it isn't explicitly named.
#15
Posted 2011-December-06, 02:22
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
#16
Posted 2011-December-06, 18:57
"top spade" or "eight-spot". I've only once had a problem with it - and that was a dummy who couldn't parse "eight-spot" because he wasn't expecting it.
#17
Posted 2011-December-08, 20:25
#18
Posted 2011-December-08, 23:21
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
#19
Posted 2011-December-09, 03:30
Maybe I should tell dummy to "rise" sometime when he has a singleton deuce. Or, then again, maybe I shouldn't because everybody will start doing it.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#20
Posted 2011-December-09, 04:13
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean