semeai, on 2011-July-28, 15:15, said:
Yes, the 3-3 both minors comment was irrelevant.
We both make on 2=4=3=4 (with my follow-up comment that I should switch to playing a spade at trick 5 if diamonds are 3-3), you make most 2=4=2=5's and I make most 2=3=4=4's. The latter are more common, aren't they?
Added: Perhaps you're right about ♠J showing hearts. In any case, if diamonds are 4=2 (and then RHO is 2=4=2=5 or 2=3=2=6), I can still make by playing ♣K and shifting to spades if it wins, if LHO has J or 10 of hearts, I think.
Looking back at my lines of play...line 3 was garbled. I win the first spade and hook the
♦, cash a
♦ and exit a spade, forcing LHO to win. The analysis is complex (at least, for me), but I think that LHO can't lead a club if he has 3.....I win cheaply in hand, cash the diamond to get it out of the way and lead the club K and rho has to duck twice...and now the 3rd club, if I read it, endplays him into breaking hearts after he cashes a diamond.
If LHO has 2 clubs, he can lead the suit, giving me a trick, but endplaying me...rho ducks, wins the 3rd round and exits a diamond both clearing the suit and endplaying me....if I cash the diamond before the 3rd round of clubs...he cashes his diamond and endplays me with a club...and I must lose 2 hearts, unless LHO has J10 tight, which he won't since we are assuming he is 6=3=2=2.
So when rho is 2=4=4=3, lho switches to a heart and I am down unless LHO started with Hx in hearts. Meanwhile, I fail on all 2=3=4=4s.
A priori (I hope Cherdano doesn't get annoyed with me), your line caters to more layouts, but a posteriori, after the spade J, it is my belief that my line caters to more at the table layouts....I don't think rho is as likely to be 2=3=4=4 as the a priori odds suggest.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari