all vul, IMP, no agreements with p except 5maj (at least it is mentioned in both profiles)
AQ9xx
xxx
Ax
AJx
p - 1S - p - 2H
p - 2S* - p - 4S
* ok, 2H usually shows 5+H, so I could have considered another bid than 2S
IMO, 2S actually is a (very) defensive bid. in red I could expect p to have at least 10 HCP, so we are in the range of full game
any suggestions?
but my real Q: what do you expect p to have? do you try slam?
Page 1 of 1
Slam, yes/no?
#2
Posted 2011-July-28, 04:55
mck4711, on 2011-July-28, 02:30, said:
all vul, IMP, no agreements with p except 5maj (at least it is mentioned in both profiles)
AQ9xx
xxx
Ax
AJx
p - 1S - p - 2H
p - 2S* - p - 4S
* ok, 2H usually shows 5+H, so I could have considered another bid than 2S
IMO, 2S actually is a (very) defensive bid. in red I could expect p to have at least 10 HCP, so we are in the range of full game
any suggestions?
but my real Q: what do you expect p to have? do you try slam?
AQ9xx
xxx
Ax
AJx
p - 1S - p - 2H
p - 2S* - p - 4S
* ok, 2H usually shows 5+H, so I could have considered another bid than 2S
IMO, 2S actually is a (very) defensive bid. in red I could expect p to have at least 10 HCP, so we are in the range of full game
any suggestions?
but my real Q: what do you expect p to have? do you try slam?
Anything from Kxx, KQJ10x, xxxx, x to KJx, AKxxx, Qxx, xx. I wouldn't expect a decent opening hand, 3 spades and a singleton or 4m might be bid.
Not clear, was 2♠ FG ? If not I wouldn't have bid it, if so, 4♠ is a bad hand.
No slam try for me.
#3
Posted 2011-July-28, 05:02
I'm in a bit of a guess now. If pard has
Kxx
AKxxx
Kxx
xx
and they get the lead right, I'm going down. But if he has
Kxx
AKQxx
xxx
xx
slam is cold. I think there's a good chance slam makes so I'd just RKCB now.
Kxx
AKxxx
Kxx
xx
and they get the lead right, I'm going down. But if he has
Kxx
AKQxx
xxx
xx
slam is cold. I think there's a good chance slam makes so I'd just RKCB now.
#4
Posted 2011-July-28, 05:54
whereagles, on 2011-July-28, 05:02, said:
I'm in a bit of a guess now. If pard has
Kxx
AKxxx
Kxx
xx
and they get the lead right, I'm going down. But if he has
Kxx
AKQxx
xxx
xx
slam is cold. I think there's a good chance slam makes so I'd just RKCB now.
Kxx
AKxxx
Kxx
xx
and they get the lead right, I'm going down. But if he has
Kxx
AKQxx
xxx
xx
slam is cold. I think there's a good chance slam makes so I'd just RKCB now.
Cold as in around 50%, I don't fancy your chances if either major is 4-1 (although stiff J or 10 of spades the right side will do).
#5
Posted 2011-July-29, 01:27
It's impossible to make an accurate decision in a guessing game. I'll just pass and hope we're not in a 5-2 fit. Even if partner shows light slam interest, slam probably wouldn't make (we lack a ♥ honor, we lack a 9th trump,...).
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#6
Posted 2011-July-29, 02:03
OK, here is part 2: whereagles was quite close with his H- and S-guess, but just close
7S are ironclad.
P had KJxxx, AKQxx, x, xx (or was it KJxxx, AKQxx, xx, x - I dont remember)
First I am to be blamed, I could have found something better than 2S, or maybe I should have tried.
On the other side I think that p's hand is too strong for 2H - 4S, considering his offense strength much too strong. Even if you lack any agreements with p re fit-raise, eg 2NT Jacoby, there is still a splinter or you just ask for aces.
What would you have bid after 1S with p's hand?
P had KJxxx, AKQxx, x, xx (or was it KJxxx, AKQxx, xx, x - I dont remember)
First I am to be blamed, I could have found something better than 2S, or maybe I should have tried.
On the other side I think that p's hand is too strong for 2H - 4S, considering his offense strength much too strong. Even if you lack any agreements with p re fit-raise, eg 2NT Jacoby, there is still a splinter or you just ask for aces.
What would you have bid after 1S with p's hand?
#7
Posted 2011-July-29, 02:19
1♠-3♥ would be my preference.
Failing that, with a solidish heart suit I'd probably conceal it as:
a) I don't need help from partner there
b) xx/xxx is not a bad holding
and either splinter or go via 2N. In my style, the immediate splinter is a void, singletons go via 2N, but we have the fit bid available in this case.
This is a slightly tricky hand, as if partner has Axxx opposite your minor suit doubleton and ♥xx, you're going to need a 3-3 heart break to get enough discards, and determining this distribution may be awkward.
Failing that, with a solidish heart suit I'd probably conceal it as:
a) I don't need help from partner there
b) xx/xxx is not a bad holding
and either splinter or go via 2N. In my style, the immediate splinter is a void, singletons go via 2N, but we have the fit bid available in this case.
This is a slightly tricky hand, as if partner has Axxx opposite your minor suit doubleton and ♥xx, you're going to need a 3-3 heart break to get enough discards, and determining this distribution may be awkward.
#8
Posted 2011-July-29, 02:46
The hand is too strong for a normal splinter. In my own methods 1S - 2NT shows a mini-splinter raise or an "in-between" splinter raise so I can deal with these hands that way. Yeti's SJS 3H response looks somewhat canonical in traditional methods, getting 2 of the 3 main aspects of the hand over in one bid, with the 3rd coming on the rebid. If the auction starts 1S - 3H - 4H - 4S, would 4NT now be 6KCB? That would be great on this hand as North can find out about ♠Kxxxx and ♥AKQxx. I think I would be too worried about 4H being passed to bid it as North though.
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1

Help
