Page 1 of 1
I've lost all my green cards again
#1
Posted 2010-December-21, 21:13
1st seat W vs. R
T98754,void,KQ9742,J
T98754,void,KQ9742,J
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#2
Posted 2010-December-21, 21:20
#3
Posted 2010-December-21, 21:24
Yes I'd pass this...
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2010-December-21, 22:48
The good thing about being dealer at W/R is that you never have to pass these hands.
Opening 3♦ or 3♠ seems to me to be the down the middle actions, but I like a 4♠ opening. One advantage to opening very distributional hands at the 4 level is that the opponents can no longer play in 3NT.
Opening 3♦ or 3♠ seems to me to be the down the middle actions, but I like a 4♠ opening. One advantage to opening very distributional hands at the 4 level is that the opponents can no longer play in 3NT.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#7
Posted 2010-December-22, 03:39
I'd pass, but if I had to open it would be 4♠ if my style allowed, also 3♠ is reasonable, 2♠ is ridicoulous.
#8
Posted 2010-December-22, 05:30
Whatever this is, it isn't a weak 2 or a preempt of any kind to me. I pass, even though I like to go mental at these colours.
#9
Posted 2010-December-22, 05:34
Agree with those saying that this is much too nice to bid less than 3-level and that the colours are too nice to Pass. Would bid 4♠ instantly if my suits were reversed, probably 3♠ now.
#10
Posted 2010-December-22, 12:22
I like 3♠, although 4♠ could certainly work well, I think it's a bit much of a punt.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#11
Posted 2010-December-22, 17:44
Pass.
My regular partners are as old or older than I am, and I want to keep them alive...I start bidding 4♠ on these, and I am taking years off of either their life expectancy or the duration of our partnership. As for 3♠....it's worse than 4♠! Almost as bad in terms of risk and with far less upside.
My regular partners are as old or older than I am, and I want to keep them alive...I start bidding 4♠ on these, and I am taking years off of either their life expectancy or the duration of our partnership. As for 3♠....it's worse than 4♠! Almost as bad in terms of risk and with far less upside.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#12
Posted 2010-December-22, 17:58
If I can pass QT765432, K5432, void, void, I can pass your hand also...
#13
Posted 2010-December-22, 18:30
2D wilkosh. If no Wilkosh I pass.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
Page 1 of 1

Help

