hrothgar, on 2012-November-16, 08:08, said:
You post reams of crap.
Every once and a while, people come on to mock you and let you know that you are despised.
The world would be a better place if you were dead.
Richard I think this post is extremely abusive.
Other people are allowed opinions and they do not have to coincide with yours. Goodness knows your view may not even coincide with the truth.
In my fairly limited experience on this topic it is very hard to believe the dangers of climate change advocates often because they resort to ad hominems as you have done or hide or even run from the flaws in their data and even have to wait for legal rulings before releasing that data for inspection.
I for one would welcome a clear exposition of the facts and an open discussion to be able to determine the truth but that is not even close to what i see from the climate scientists who advocate AGW nor in many cases from their supporters. These people on the one hand acknowledge say things like "We dont know what natural variability is doing." Professor Phil Jones whilst on the other hand trumpeting ad infinitum that the science is settled. To me these people want the cake and to eat it too.
As I say i am happy to read about facts in an open and straight forward way but to my mind the advocates of AGW have a long way to move to approach open and straight forward.