BBO Discussion Forums: Puppet vs Regular Stayman/2NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Puppet vs Regular Stayman/2NT Responder 4M/5+m, slammish

#1 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-August-07, 13:04

My question concerns Responder having a 4 card Major ( M ) and a longer minor ( m ) , slammish-- Puppet vs NO Puppet.

1) If playing NO Puppet:

2NT   -   3C! ( Regular Stayman )
3M    -   4m = ??

Is 4m = a) natural ( 5+m) and 4oM ( 4 cards in the other-Major ) , slammish ? or

              b ) an advance cue agreeing M ?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2) Playing a common version of Puppet:

2NT    -      3C! ( Puppet )
3D ( have one or both 4 cd Majors )   -     3M! ( NO 4M but have 4oM )
3NT ( have 4M but NO 4oM )   -     4m = clearly natural, 5+minor, slammish


Whaddya think ? Puppet seems to remove the ambiguity.
Or am I missing something ?
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#2 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2010-August-07, 13:15

After 2N:3C, 3M, bidding 3S over 3H or 4H over 3S should be slam-try for the major. 4m is natural.

Playing regular Stayman, opener doesn't know which major responder has after 2N:3C, 3D:4m, and while you're not likely to want to play in it, it can still be useful to know. Most versions of puppet don't have this issue.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users