Posted 2010-July-27, 13:45
This hand turned out to be uninteresting. Like I said when it was originally played in a field of 57, slam was bid a lot of times -- it true, that NS bidding then was more fierce than the 1-3 given here. I didn't take that into account.
As for the scores, since everyone bid the same (well except for one), it really doesn't matter. If you want to be pragmatic, 6 or 7 for game is fine. However, i am not going to change the scores as it just makes busy work for me, as there is no real difference in changing them to the overall result., other than helene_t would gain 4 imps on the field average. There is some logic to that, as her zero is more painful than it might otherwise be given the field averaged so much more than normal, but as usual, I will resist logic.
--Ben--
Board 7. Bidding Script: South opens 1♦. north will jump to 3♦ if possible. After this NS are out of the auction.
Notes: This is a hand were many people in the real world bid to slam. After West makes a takeout double of 1♦, one might imagine slam. In fact, on a ♦ lead, you are just one
pitch short of making 6♠.
4♠=10, 5♣=2, slams=0