How many Spades? And when?
#1
Posted 2010-July-11, 10:24
♠AT96532
♥654
♦
♣964
1♥-???
Let's suppose you pass:
1♥-Pa-1NT*-X
2♣-???
And finally:
1♥-Pa-1NT*-X
2♥-2♠-3♦-X
3♥-Pa-Pa-3♠
Pa-???
How many spades in each case?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2010-July-11, 11:40
#3
Posted 2010-July-11, 11:41
Q2) 2♠ this is an unforced call
Q3) 4♠ partner should not be bidding on Swiss cheese
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2010-July-11, 11:44
#5
Posted 2010-July-11, 13:26
#6
Posted 2010-July-11, 13:38
I'd much rather bid now than later. Preempting after opps know their strength and distribution sorta misses the point.
#8
Posted 2010-July-11, 13:41
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2010-July-11, 14:04
#10
Posted 2010-July-11, 14:14
#11
Posted 2010-July-11, 16:16
JLOGIC, on Jul 11 2010, 03:04 PM, said:
Indeed. Pass on the first round I can understand, but 2♠ on the second round I really don't.
#12
Posted 2010-July-11, 16:34
Obv a lot depends on his club holding. If he has, say Kxx vs Axx that can swing 2 or 3 tricks sometimes. But sometimes they have to lead a club rather than a heart to capitalize, or underlead their heart the 2nd round. And if worst comes to worst and he has neither round suit ace it's possible we're going down in 3 anyways. I don't feel like partner will be able to evaluate well enough over 3, and will be overly worried about trumps.
#13
Posted 2010-July-11, 23:13
#14
Posted 2010-July-11, 23:19
If someone doesn't bid 2, presumably it's because they don't deem the hand good enough. This seems reasonable with 3 small hearts, but I think the 7 card suit combined with the T9 of spades makes this too conservative.
If someone doesn't bid 1 presumably it's because their style makes this unacceptable and they will get buried/their partner will double/or something.
If 1S was not an option I'd rank 2S>>>P>>>>>>>>>>>>>3S but I am happy to bid 1 so w/e. I think not bidding 2 is just a conservative view.
I could see how one could have a style/set of agreements where they pass, but the final result that you have to pass with this hand seems ridiculous.
#15
Posted 2010-July-11, 23:35
#16
Posted 2010-July-12, 00:36
Actually , partner who held ♠KQJx told me later he knew I held a 7 card suit, since I needed a 7th card to bid 2♠ with a weak suit at that vulnerability.
#17
Posted 2010-July-12, 03:35
1♠ is reasonable
I wouldn't bid 3♠ this weak
Maybe pass is possible.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#18
Posted 2010-July-12, 05:15
Hanoi5, on Jul 11 2010, 04:24 PM, said:
this is quite defamatory. I died in a shock.
George Carlin
#19
Posted 2010-July-12, 11:24
♥654
♦
♣964
1♥-???
Let's suppose you pass:
1♥-Pa-1NT*-X
2♣-???
And finally:
1♥-Pa-1NT*-X
2♥-2♠-3♦-X
3♥-Pa-Pa-3♠
Pa-???
How many spades in each case?
pass 2s pass
overcall 1s (r vs w) can do nothing except incite insanity in future partners (this one will leave you after seeing your "overcall")
I have much more sympathy for those that try the risky 2s than 1s.
2s having passed (thank gooodness) this 2s bid should not get p overly excited and
realize this bid is primarily based on length
pass I have a partner that felt doubling 3d was a better shot than inviting 3s
and their dia power is bad news opposite my void. I feel i would have to be lucky to make 3s at this point.
#20
Posted 2010-July-12, 23:09

Help
