Here is a NABC hand that was sent to me, I have already given my answer and would like to see how others would tackle it. Plan the play.
Page 1 of 1
Play this for me
#1
Posted 2009-July-31, 01:09
Here is a NABC hand that was sent to me, I have already given my answer and would like to see how others would tackle it. Plan the play.
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#2
Posted 2009-July-31, 06:31
Without much thought i would go with small ♠ from the dummy, win the ♠A, ♣A, ♠K, ruff a ♣, ♠J, ♦Q, top club.
#3
Posted 2009-July-31, 07:36
♠A; ♣A; ♠K
If ♠Q doesnt appear, you have absolutely no chance to bring this home.
Play ♣K discarding ♦ then ♣J. -1 if you find ♣Q; -2 if not.
If ♠Q does appear.
IMO %play is ♠ to dummy; ♦finesse; ♣K discarding ♥; ♣J discarding ♥ (if not covered )
Edit: ruffed-->covered
If ♠Q doesnt appear, you have absolutely no chance to bring this home.
Play ♣K discarding ♦ then ♣J. -1 if you find ♣Q; -2 if not.
If ♠Q does appear.
IMO %play is ♠ to dummy; ♦finesse; ♣K discarding ♥; ♣J discarding ♥ (if not covered )
Edit: ruffed-->covered
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
#4
Posted 2009-July-31, 08:49
I can't handle the ten being single, so win in hand. Draw another round of trumps, A♣, ♦ finesse (I NEED this). Ruff a club. Draw another round of trump. ♦ tot he ace, hope ♣s run. If trumps were 4-1, I should still be able to get to hand with a ♦ ruff. I hope.
Hoping for 4♠s, 1♥, 2♦s, 5♣s, losing a ♠ likely.
Hoping for 4♠s, 1♥, 2♦s, 5♣s, losing a ♠ likely.
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.
"gwnn" said:
rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#5
Posted 2009-August-02, 06:15
This needs spade Q to be doubleton, diamond finesse to work and some miracles in clubs. I like the line by Simplicity
#6
Posted 2009-August-02, 08:54
Not a BIL answer:
Playing for ♣Q coming in 3 rounds is inferior to playing for ruffing club finese.
Spoiler
Playing for ♣Q coming in 3 rounds is inferior to playing for ruffing club finese.
#7
Posted 2009-August-02, 11:54
Fluffy, on Aug 2 2009, 09:54 AM, said:
Best defence now would be to play a club
Why not a diamond?
If ♦K is on and RHO has ♠Qx then i think that your line needs ♥ 3-3 or LHO with 4♥, that is 36+24=60%
But ♣4-3 or Qx is 62+8+8=78%
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
#8
Posted 2009-August-03, 09:28
Yes, you are right, I was auto removing dummy's entry in my pre analysis because I didn't yet know that I could avoid the diamond finese.
Page 1 of 1

Help

1♣:1♥
2♠:4n
5♣:6♠
lead ♠10