BBO Discussion Forums: Does it force one round? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Does it force one round?

#1 User is offline   Aberlour10 

  • Vugrapholic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,018
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:At the Rhine River km 772,1

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:10

Playing SAYC, P opens 2 in first seat

holding...

K
AQxxxx
AK
KJxx

2 NT response would mean strong forcing, I know. My question: Is it allowed to bid instead 3, does it force one round? What do you mean?

Robert
Preempts are Aberlour's best bridge friends
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:17

Comment 1:

Whether or not 3 is forcing is a matter of partnership agreement. I prefer a style in which 3 would be forcing. I believe that this is more common than not. However, I have played in more than one partnership where new suits are nonforicng.

Comment 2: I think that most people would describe their 2NT as an asking bid rather than storng and forcing.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,399
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:26

3 would be forcing by almost everyone, I think. Pairs who play it as nonforcing are probably either very old-fashioned, or play junk preempts.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:28

This is what the SAYC system includes.
2S-3H: 3H is 5+ hearts and forcing for one round
2S-2NT: 2NT is asking partner to show a feature if he has a maximum range weak two. Minimum weak two will rebid spades. Feature is a side king or side ace.

Other agreements are possible. What one might call "standard" is that new suits are forcing and if you play with a pickup good player, assume this unless you had specifically agreed them as nonforcing.
0

#5 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:29

Haven't checked my SAYC booklet recently but my gut reaction is that SAYC plays RONF [Raise only NON-FORCING bid] so yes if you are playing with me you will get another bid
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#6 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-July-29, 10:48

pooltuna, on Jul 29 2009, 11:29 AM, said:

Haven't checked my SAYC booklet recently but my gut reaction is that SAYC plays RONF [Raise only NON-FORCING bid] so yes if you are playing with me you will get another bid

This is correct.
0

#7 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2009-July-29, 11:20

Playing this as forcing is imo best.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#8 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2009-July-29, 15:22

Free, on Jul 30 2009, 05:20 AM, said:

Playing this as forcing is imo best.

Not sure whether or not it is best but the normal standard is definitely RONF

R aise

O nly

N on-

F orce

Which means that

2Maj (PASS) 3Maj is not forcing

and anything else below game is forcing.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#9 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2009-July-29, 15:45

Cascade, on Jul 29 2009, 04:22 PM, said:

Free, on Jul 30 2009, 05:20 AM, said:

Playing this as forcing is imo best.

Not sure whether or not it is best but the normal standard is definitely RONF

R aise

O nly

N on-

F orce

Which means that

2Maj (PASS) 3Maj is not forcing

and anything else below game is forcing.

Just to clarify (in case it's not clear from the word 'raise'), it's only 3 of the same major that's non-forcing, e.g. 2 - 3 or 2 - 3.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,031
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-July-29, 15:55

As always, it depends on agreement.

It is quite common to play RONF, raise only nonforcing.

The main factor in deciding, what to play, is how crappy could the
weak two bid look like.

For B/I purposes I would suggest, you play RONF.

One adv. is, that would play a similar structure after a 2 level preempt
as after a 3 level preempt, and if you opened on the 3 level, most
players would play new suits as forcing.

I am not sure, this is covered in the SAYC notes.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2009-July-29, 20:56

Here is a method that solves all problems for responder after a pre-empt by his partner.

Any bid after a pre-empt by your partner is a transfer! (One round only.)

Now you can:

* Play in your suit with a weak hand and total intolerance for partner
* You can make a forcing bid with a new suit, and also get to bid the next one up naturally without losing a level of bidding
* You can make an invite and show your suit at the same time to help pard judge whether to accept
* You can splinter
* You can still further the pre-empt

2 2NT
3 3 - forcing hand with clubs and diamonds

2 3
3 4 - want to play in 4

2 3
3 3 - invite with a diamond suit, so partner can judge on medium hands whether to accept

2 3 - general invite

2 3
3 4 - cue, slam interest even after the rejection

2 2NT
3 4 - slam invite with a side club suit that needs a little help

2 3
3 pass - want to play in 3 - long suit, singleton/void spade, weak

2 3 - normal furthering the pre-empt

2 4 - to play

2 3NT - to play

2 4 - splinter
I Transfers
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users