6C Doomed Vugraph Hand
#1
Posted 2009-June-08, 09:27
#2
Posted 2009-June-08, 09:46
A priori this is:
Diamond finesse = 50%
Spades 3-3 = 36% x 50% = 18%
♦Q singleton offside = 1% x 32% = not very much
LHO having four spades, RHO having ♦Qx = less than 24% x 24% * 1/3 * 32% = also not very much
The effect of the overcall is probably to increase the chance of the diamond finesse working, reduce the chance of the 3-3 break, and increase the chance of the squeeze working.
#3
Posted 2009-June-08, 09:47
I like my chances a lot actually. Probably like 60/40 to 75/25
#4
Posted 2009-June-08, 10:08
#5
Posted 2009-June-08, 11:20
#6
Posted 2009-June-08, 12:07
Suppose you ruff the first club and can pull trumps in two rounds, ending in dummy. It seems fair to assume that South will have the diamond Queen. If that is protected, South has at least five hearts and three diamonds. If North never peeped, South probably has six or more hearts. If he has any clubs, he cannot have four spades but probably has fewer than three.
So, the only squeeze possible is against North. But, North is unlikely to have the diamond Queen, making that line unlikely to succeed.
However, give South 1642 shape, with Qxxx in diamonds. That gives North 5422 shape. If South cannot trust North's carding, because North might be falsecarding or something, then Ace-King(dropping 10)-small toward 9 might give South a problem. For, of you started with ♠AK63 ♥Qx ♦10x ♣AKQ9x, rising Queen gives you an unmakeable contract.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2009-June-08, 16:25
Isn't it better to start with ♠QAK and
- If N has 4c♠ play for the squeeze
- If S has 4c♠ finesse ♦
?
#8
Posted 2009-June-08, 17:42
South was at adverse, so inferences from the failure to make a weak jump overcall are unreliable. North was at adverse too, so we can't conclude much from his failure to raise in what was probably a strong-sounding auction.
I wonder whether the people who chose the squeeze line actually thought about any of this, or whether they just like playing squeezes.
This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-June-08, 17:43
#9
Posted 2009-June-08, 17:48
#10
Posted 2009-June-09, 11:45
kgr, on Jun 8 2009, 11:25 PM, said:
Isn't it better to start with ♠QAK and
- If N has 4c♠ play for the squeeze
- If S has 4c♠ finesse ♦
?
No, starting with ♠ is a poor choice.
If N has 4♠s you can also play on the finesse, since to play for the squeeze you place ♦Q in the North hand...
#11
Posted 2009-June-09, 11:58
Free, on Jun 9 2009, 12:45 PM, said:
kgr, on Jun 8 2009, 11:25 PM, said:
Isn't it better to start with ♠QAK and
- If N has 4c♠ play for the squeeze
- If S has 4c♠ finesse ♦
?
No, starting with ♠ is a poor choice.
If N has 4♠s you can also play on the finesse, since to play for the squeeze you place ♦Q in the North hand...
Not true, the squeeze is a showup squeeze. If north has four small diamonds he will have to throw two and you will drop Qx offside.
#12
Posted 2009-June-09, 13:27
A full auction would be useful.
#13
Posted 2009-June-10, 02:29
hanp, on Jun 9 2009, 08:27 PM, said:
Yes, if South has a trump void it is reasonable to play the squeeze line. If he has a singleton trump, the finesse line is probably better - if he's 4531, it's evens whether he has ♦Q or not, but the finesse line gains against more of the 4621s.

Help

As the cards were, there was no way to make,
however what would be your line of play here,
and what do you estimate that the percenages are?