BBO Discussion Forums: Just checking - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Just checking

#1 User is offline   Edmunte1 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 2003-October-26
  • Location:Galati, Romania

Posted 2009-April-27, 15:40

I'm just checking a position encountered in National Pairs Championship, that involved afterwards director's decision (i'm not going to detaliate now). What's your bid as South?
Scoring: MP

1♣-(pass)-1♥-(2♥)(1)
?
(1)Michaels

0

#2 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-April-27, 15:47

I would double and hope partner takes this as a raise. I think it is the most useful interpretation.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,751
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2009-April-27, 16:12

hanp, on Apr 27 2009, 04:47 PM, said:

I would double and hope partner takes this as a raise. I think it is the most useful interpretation.

Me too.. and I would add that this should show either this hand (minimum) or a complex, powerful hand with genuine support (will take a voluntary strength showing call later if need be). if I held a 3♥ raise, i should make the raise, rather than let them make me do something I had no reason to do.

Simple often works in these situations.... btw, who plays 2♥ michaels here? Not many, I bet.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-April-27, 17:17

Since I have no specific agreement I'd assume support double is on here.

This doesn't mean that double is not the best option, but it doesn't describe a minimum 4 card support at least for me.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#5 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-April-27, 17:40

Double for me too. Even if it is interpreted as "Support" then I'm still OK with it, since I have a bad minimum anyway.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#6 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-April-27, 17:48

mikeh, on Apr 27 2009, 05:12 PM, said:

Simple often works in these situations.... btw, who plays 2♥ michaels here? Not many, I bet.

Not me.

http://web2.acbl.org...5spring/db5.pdf

(Page 6 -- "Mini-Moysian")
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#7 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2009-April-27, 18:08

I would bid 3♥ to show my heart support.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#8 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2009-April-27, 19:28

One thing I wouldn't do is bid 3♥. My hand was not great to begin with, now, my secondary honor (the ♠Q) isn't setting up, nor is my potential length winner (the 4th spade). This isn't going to be a challenging lead problem for LHO, he'll trumps against our heart contract, since he's not looking at the top ones.

I would assume, without discussion, at least in North America, that double shows a desire to penalize the opponents. I think this is theoretically analogous to another thread where it went 1♥-(P)-1NT-2♥; ?. Double there was penalty without agreement to the contrary, but I think it makes more sense in both threads to have double mean "I want to compete in one of our suits."
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

#9 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-April-27, 20:10

Agree with 655321.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#10 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2009-April-27, 21:22

Why didn't I open 1H? Even a 5xM lie?
0

#11 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-April-27, 21:43

Showing a heart raise seems clearly most useful here. But I fear partner and me both independently having to agree what is most useful on each auction without seeing the hand of the other or having discussed it.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#12 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-April-28, 00:46

I suppose you asked and were told that 2H was Michaels. It would not be Michaels for me or for any of my partners.

Dbl now, hoping support double is on here. Slightly hazy but I am not going to climb on the 3-level with this hand.
0

#13 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-April-28, 01:50

In Romania at most 5% of partnerships have discussed this as natural and I have seen several pairs trying it undiscussed as some sort of two suited bid arguing post mortem 'how could it possibly be natural?!' but maybe Edi has experienced otherwise.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#14 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-April-28, 05:28

Why should we care whether if 2H was natural or michaels? If the opponent's want to play michaels then let them I say :(
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#15 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-April-28, 06:19

It's an add for the good-bad 2NT :(

Without it, I dunno... maybe dbl, maybe pass.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users