Will you rebid something now? If you pass, you partner will double again, any bid then?
Respond to negative double
#1
Posted 2008-May-24, 08:24
Will you rebid something now? If you pass, you partner will double again, any bid then?
#2
Posted 2008-May-24, 09:23
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#4
Posted 2008-May-24, 10:21
Over partner's next double you can bid 4♦.
#5
Posted 2008-May-24, 10:23
#6
Posted 2008-May-24, 10:26
pclayton, on May 24 2008, 11:23 AM, said:
Because playing a 6-1 fit in a crappy suit on the 4 level with hardly more than half the deck is bad for your score?
#7
Posted 2008-May-24, 10:39
And if you force me to do something else, I would probably not choose 4♣ or 4♦, but 3NT.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#8
Posted 2008-May-24, 11:03
#9
Posted 2008-May-24, 11:21
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#11
Posted 2008-May-24, 11:51
Over another double both 3NT and 4♦ is possible. I'll go with 4♦.
Harald
#12
Posted 2008-May-24, 12:06
skaeran, on May 24 2008, 12:51 PM, said:
Over another double both 3NT and 4♦ is possible. I'll go with 4♦.
We agree.
#14
Posted 2008-May-24, 13:20
jdonn, on May 24 2008, 11:21 AM, said:
This.
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2008-May-25, 12:58
a) take-out, usually 3 spades and extra values, short in hearts
c) Optional, e.g. likely flat 18 count or so.
#16
Posted 2008-May-25, 15:26
I gotta bid now, and 4♦, albeit a slight overbid, seems to be the most descriptive call.
#17
Posted 2008-May-25, 15:26
mr1303, on May 25 2008, 07:58 PM, said:
Takeout, but it includes both pure takeout doubles (eg a strong 3=1=4=5) and strong hands that want to bid 3NT but don't have a heart stop.
#18
Posted 2008-May-25, 15:56
whereagles, on May 25 2008, 04:26 PM, said:
That's not true, it's usually a minimum but no reason that it's usually balanced, at least not by any more than you hold balanced hands vs unbalanced hands. You just invented that part out of thin air
#19
Posted 2008-May-25, 17:29
jdonn, on May 24 2008, 11:26 AM, said:
pclayton, on May 24 2008, 11:23 AM, said:
Because playing a 6-1 fit in a crappy suit on the 4 level with hardly more than half the deck is bad for your score?
Yeah, but it will really help your hopeless contract dummy technique.
#20 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-25, 19:19

Help

1♣-(2♥)-dbl-(3♥)-?