Page 1 of 1
Should I have bid or passed?
#1
Posted 2007-December-16, 03:41
SAYC, no one vulnerable, IMP
My hand:
♠ K J 10 9 7 4 2
♥ 7
♦ -
♣ A K J 8 4
I was sitting in South.
West dealer
The bidding went:
1♥ p 3♥ 4♥
Hoping my partner would bid 4♠. His hand:
♠ 8 3
♥ J 10
♦ Q 7 5 4 3 2
♣ 9 5 2
He didn't like my bid.
What do you think?
My hand:
♠ K J 10 9 7 4 2
♥ 7
♦ -
♣ A K J 8 4
I was sitting in South.
West dealer
The bidding went:
1♥ p 3♥ 4♥
Hoping my partner would bid 4♠. His hand:
♠ 8 3
♥ J 10
♦ Q 7 5 4 3 2
♣ 9 5 2
He didn't like my bid.
What do you think?
#2
Posted 2007-December-16, 04:06
Just bid what you think you can make (4♠),no problems yet
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2007-December-16, 06:43
Hi,
I dont like your bid either, unless 4H is Michaels,
in which case I would have expected, that you said
this.
If 4H is not Michaels, the bid is simply ..., you make
an unclear cue bid, get an unspecified response and
start guessing.
Either bid 4S direct, or make a t/o bid followed by 4S,
both should be ok, at least you will be able to control
the auction.
With kind regards
Marlowe
I dont like your bid either, unless 4H is Michaels,
in which case I would have expected, that you said
this.
If 4H is not Michaels, the bid is simply ..., you make
an unclear cue bid, get an unspecified response and
start guessing.
Either bid 4S direct, or make a t/o bid followed by 4S,
both should be ok, at least you will be able to control
the auction.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2007-December-16, 08:59
P_Marlowe, on Dec 16 2007, 07:43 AM, said:
I dont like your bid either, unless 4H is Michaels,
in which case I would have expected, that you said
this.
Thank you Marlowe
My intention was to bid Michaels, but I was unsure if it was usable after the sequence 1♥-pass-3♥, since up to that moment we had been using Michaels only after RH player's opening at level 1.
#5
Posted 2007-December-16, 09:12
pippo13, on Dec 16 2007, 09:59 AM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Dec 16 2007, 07:43 AM, said:
I dont like your bid either, unless 4H is Michaels,
in which case I would have expected, that you said
this.
Thank you Marlowe
My intention was to bid Michaels, but I was unsure if it was usable after the sequence 1♥-pass-3♥, since up to that moment we had been using Michaels only after RH player's opening at level 1.
Hi,
Using 4H as Michaels is certainly a sensible
agreement to have, but it is not common
sense.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2007-December-16, 09:46
Even with Michaels agreed you should bid 4♠.
You have seven spades and five clubs so why let p choose, he cannot know this.
With five spades and seven clubs Michaels would be ok.
You have seven spades and five clubs so why let p choose, he cannot know this.
With five spades and seven clubs Michaels would be ok.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#7
Posted 2007-December-16, 09:51
Agree with just bidding 4S.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2007-December-16, 22:42
7♠ and nothing wrong with the suit, so I'd just bid them and not worry about ♣ and cue bids that may muddy the water for PD.
#9
Posted 2007-December-16, 23:19
4♠ is normal.
If you had longer clubs that spades, then the Michaels cue has more appeal.
If you had longer clubs that spades, then the Michaels cue has more appeal.
"Phil" on BBO
Page 1 of 1

Help
