BBO Discussion Forums: How did GIB play it? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How did GIB play it?

#1 User is offline   Wackojack 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 925
  • Joined: 2004-September-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:I have discovered that the water cooler is a chrono-synclastic infundibulum

Posted 2007-July-13, 10:08

Scoring: IMP


E S W N
1 p 1 1
3 p 3 p
3nt p 6nt p p
p


Human South led 10 covered by Q, Ace, 3. GIB North returned the 8. GIB East spurned the marked!! finesse taking with the King, South following with the 5. GIB proceeded to make the contract. Any guesses how and why? Would you play it this way?
May 2003: Mission accomplished
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
0

#2 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-13, 11:17

GIB does not know much about leading agreements, but is great in counting.

So lets count:
West has 2's, East has 4's this means 7 are with NS.
North bid 1 showing 5+ of these. After the first trick, North has 4+'s and south is left with 1-'s. So the chance that the J is with north is 80%.
So GIB is 80% confident that north has the J and is taking the finesse.

So if playing 10 is not promising the J this seems to be the best plan, even for humans.
0

#3 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-13, 11:34

At a guess? It's marked North with the spade king, and can therefore squeeze the hand out.

After taking the 2nd heart, run off 6 clubs, dicarding two diamonds and two spades.



On the second diamond, discard a heart. On the last diamond, North has to reduce himself to two cards...either the Kx of spades or the K of spades and J of hearts. Either way, EW makes the contract.

So once it decides that North has the spade king, finessing the heart is unnecessary.
0

#4 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-13, 12:22

You may be right, but GIB is always guessing.
GIB samples a few hands (I think it can do 5-10 in the given time) and checks what move is best.
Asuming that north holding is 5+ 's, it is possible that GIB sampled a hand or two where the K is with south. Making the finesse look better.

The relevance of the sampled hands, get's better the more cards have been played. At trick 2 GIB's analyzed sample set may be quite far from the true distribution.
0

#5 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2007-July-13, 13:17

jtfanclub got it.
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-July-13, 18:17

I'd say he cashed A at viena coup and tried for the 'double' squeeze, or diamond drop.
0

#7 User is offline   Wackojack 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 925
  • Joined: 2004-September-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:I have discovered that the water cooler is a chrono-synclastic infundibulum

Posted 2007-July-14, 06:32

Yes jtfan got it exactly. Why would GIB make such a play? It strikes me that GIB gave itself the extra chance that human south was leading from J10 doubleton. When that proved not to be the case then the squeeze on North would operate, provided that North also held the King of spades. Probably not a good enough reason for a human to do this.

Interesting that had GIB played Vienna coup according to Fluffy's guess it would also have succeeded as North held 10xxx in diamonds and so would be squeezed in 3 suits.
May 2003: Mission accomplished
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users