Page 1 of 1
So Cal Bridge News-3
#2
Posted 2005-November-02, 18:34
oh well, i'll go first... 1H (and i thought about 4H)
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#4
Posted 2005-November-02, 19:11
1♥
Anything other than 1♥ strikes me as insulting to partner.
And I am aware that bidding 1♥ could, on a bad day, allow LHO to introduce ♠, to our ultimate detriment.
Anything other than 1♥ strikes me as insulting to partner.
And I am aware that bidding 1♥ could, on a bad day, allow LHO to introduce ♠, to our ultimate detriment.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#5
Posted 2005-November-02, 19:51
1♥.
But I'm sure Marshall will have reasons why double, 2♥ or 4♥ is better.
But I'm sure Marshall will have reasons why double, 2♥ or 4♥ is better.
"Phil" on BBO
#7
Posted 2005-November-03, 03:43
With my points in my suit, I might try 3 or 4H, but on this hand, I don't see any urgency to attempt anything fascinating. 1H is therefore plenty.
#8
Posted 2005-November-03, 10:35
mikeh, on Nov 2 2005, 08:11 PM, said:
1♥
Anything other than 1♥ strikes me as insulting to partner.
And I am aware that bidding 1♥ could, on a bad day, allow LHO to introduce ♠, to our ultimate detriment.
Anything other than 1♥ strikes me as insulting to partner.
And I am aware that bidding 1♥ could, on a bad day, allow LHO to introduce ♠, to our ultimate detriment.
As MikeH brought up there may be tactical advantages that overcome the negatives for 3H? I thought 3H versus 1H was worth discussion as both have advantages and disadvantages at MP.
Page 1 of 1

Help

1C=(1D)=?