MP
Page 1 of 1
quick Q
#1
Posted Yesterday, 08:34
MP
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#3
Posted Yesterday, 08:40
hrothgar, on 2025-May-19, 08:38, said:
1♥
perhaps 2♦, but today 1♥
(don't have strong objections to pass)
perhaps 2♦, but today 1♥
(don't have strong objections to pass)
it's the n/b forum, please elaborate
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#4
Posted Yesterday, 08:58
1NT, take out the 1♥/1♠ bid of either opponent Then hope partner bids a very aggressive 3♦ for you to pass on, and you've probably stolen the part score. Not enough strength for 2♣ not enough ♦ to support ♦. Psyching 1♥/♠ as someone seems to (jokingly?) suggest could see partner simply raising it to 4. Pass is an option, but you need to be sure of your partnerships upper limit for a 1 opening.
#5
Posted Yesterday, 09:06
Huibertus, on 2025-May-19, 08:58, said:
1NT, take out the 1♥/1♠ bid of either opponent Then hope partner bids a very aggressive 3♦ for you to pass on, and you've probably stolen the part score. Not enough strength for 2♣ not enough ♦ to support ♦. Psyching 1♥/♠ as someone seems to (jokingly?) suggest could see partner simply raising it to 4.
1♥ is not a psych
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#6
Posted Yesterday, 09:22
Huibertus, on 2025-May-19, 08:58, said:
1NT, take out the 1♥/1♠ bid of either opponent Then hope partner bids a very aggressive 3♦ for you to pass on, and you've probably stolen the part score. Not enough strength for 2♣ not enough ♦ to support ♦. Psyching 1♥/♠ as someone seems to (jokingly?) suggest could see partner simply raising it to 4. Pass is an option, but you need to be sure of your partnerships upper limit for a 1 opening.
1♥ is not intended as a psych. I think that its a good description of the hand.
I'd consider the bid absolutely clear cut if the red suit holdings were reversed.
If partner raises to three or even four hearts, I expect this to have good play.
To me, at least, 1NT promises real values. It's one of the bids that I would never consider.
I think that pass is much better.
I also think that 2♦ is more than reasonable. Partner rates to have four hearts.
Please note, my club length is the main reason that I am not bidding 2♦.
My club length increases the chance that partner holds the dread 4=4=3=2 pattern.
Even so, I don't consider 2♦ at all unreasonable.
Alderaan delenda est
#7
Posted Yesterday, 09:50
1NT, with pass being a worse second option. I've already been accused of masterminding so I'll refrain from showing 4(+)♥ with 1♥ or 10-11 HCP with 2♦. Most people also require four diamonds to raise, especially if 1♦ is regularly only 4 cards.
Your 1♦ style matters here, as does your 2♣ style with primary diamonds.
As a bonus, 1NT promises (for some people 'promises') 4(+)♣ and commonly denies four diamonds. Partner should be in a good position to decide what to do.
Not N/B:
Your 1♦ style matters here, as does your 2♣ style with primary diamonds.
As a bonus, 1NT promises (for some people 'promises') 4(+)♣ and commonly denies four diamonds. Partner should be in a good position to decide what to do.
Not N/B:
Spoiler
#10
Posted Yesterday, 14:03
I prefer 1nt to pass, but with xx, Jxx in the majors, I'm far more comfortable with 1H
Where are the spades, and the rest of the hearts?
Where are the spades, and the rest of the hearts?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#14
Posted Today, 12:39
pescetom, on 2025-May-20, 12:35, said:
I can't imagine anything other than 1NT or Pass, and not just because this is N/B forum.
I would choose 1NT, partner opened in 4th seat and I trust her to have a good reason.
I would choose 1NT, partner opened in 4th seat and I trust her to have a good reason.
Should have a good reason playing what I play as 1N in 4th seat is 11-bad 14 ish
Would bid 1N
Page 1 of 1