pescetom, on 2023-December-08, 16:07, said:
A three table movement sounds like this club is at it's last breath.
Have you considered problems more important than the low quality of play, such as surviving?
Merging with another club (preferably nearby and trusted, but not necessarily) may be a good start.
This might be better in a new thread, but my thoughts/experience:
The club has around 300 members so it is in a healthy position in that sense. The problem is that attendance has been on a downturn over the last year or so, even the BBO sessions which should be immune to the UK's poor weather.
I am heavily reigning bridge in from now on because firstly I have found other things to do on the F2F evenings and secondly, I have had enough with the frequent toxic sessions which I initially look forward too but consistently antagonise me and leave me feeling I am wasting my time, if not making a fool out of me (no it is not because of my partner). When the sourness of the bridge experience exceeds the joy of my partner's company it is time to call it a day.
After being on the committee for many years I have resigned, partly because I don't like the way the club has gone since the pandemic and it is not the club I joined just over 20 years ago. The committee I feel has swung the pendulum too far towards beginners, and whilst bringing in new players through teaching and practice is essential, I don't believe it is the only thing that should be done. I feel there needs to be some focus on quality bridge sessions and rewarding people through competitions for good quality bridge, not as is happening now handicapping almost everything and, as the secretary said, setting the competitions up so that the inexperienced players can win. Is it really wrong to advocate a good quality game of bridge alongside the recruitment and teaching?
My observation combined with gut feeling is that a consequence of being focused almost entirely on beginners is that attendance at sessions is going down. I have looked at stats on Pianola and despite the high number of members, over a third of them were playing no more than once a month in the duplicate sessions and several more only playing marginally more frequently. With that level of enthusiasm is it any wonder four table movements are common? The second Tuesday F2F session is one session that is doing much better because it is marketed as a social evening with drink and nibbles and fewer boards played, which is more attractive to the inexperienced players. It seems that enthusiasm for competitive duplicate play is low and many of the membership would rather play socially, hence why several of the beginners play at someones house or even down a local pub rather than at the club.
Finally, one issue stifling the attendance of at least some inexperienced players to the main duplicate sessions is the perception that they are full of good and serious players and they will be out of their depth or it will be unpleasant. This is nonsense as a look at all the hands I have posted on here over several years will illustrate but perception trumps fact where people are concerned. I don't see a way around this.