BBO Discussion Forums: Thanks to Ben aka Inquiry - made this squeeze - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Thanks to Ben aka Inquiry - made this squeeze But is it the best line?

#1 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 06:18

Scoring: MP

I was West. Auction, uncontested. 1-1-2-4-all p


Pretty normal auction. Not necessarily the best defense, but North lead AK and a third , winning in dummy, pitching a club from my hand. I then took 3 rounds of hearts, ending in dummy, followed by a to the Q, which held. I then cashed the A and the 8 to leave this position:

Scoring: MP

I was West. Auction, uncontested. 1-1-2-4-all p


On the last , South is cooked. So, wadda all you folks think? Good or lucky? In any event I am giving myself a pat on the back lol... I have a mental block when it comes to squeezes, so I am proud just to have played the cards the way I did :-)
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#2 User is offline   pigpenz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,554
  • Joined: 2005-April-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 06:26

yes, nice squeeze! thats why on defense its important early on to break up the communication on defense.
0

#3 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 06:41

Thanks. An alternative line once in dummy with the Q would be to hook a club right away and try to ruff clubs in dummy but I think it is (obviously?) inferior due to the possibility of giving up a heart trick either as a ruff or promotion. I dunno for sure tho. Hence the post.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-May-07, 07:09

Nice play! This is a difficult problem at the table. I think the alternative you suggest (trying to ruff a club in dummy) might be a little better. You win when clubs are 3-3, or when North has two clubs and 3 hearts. Your squeeze only works only when clubs are 4-2, and the long club hand has QJ as well, which is less likely. However, your line has better chances against 4-1 trumps. And the squeeze is more fun!
(There is a 3rd possibility of playing KA before trying to ruff a club; then you win when clubs are 3-3, or when the hand with 3 hearts has also 4 clubs and 3 spades; I doubt it is better.)

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 07:56

[Deleted due to being stupendously dumb]
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#6 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2005-May-07, 08:29

Rebound, on May 7 2005, 07:41 AM, said:

An alternative line once in dummy with the Q would be to hook a club right away and try to ruff clubs in dummy but I think it is (obviously?) inferior due to the possibility of giving up a heart trick either as a ruff or promotion.

That doesn't seem right - if the club finesse is right, then you're always making the contract unless there's a bad trump break (and even then you have good chances). But if the club finesse is wrong, then you'll always go down if you draw trumps first, whereas if you take the finesse immediately you might still make.
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2005-May-07, 15:37

Chances of squeeze are 'poor' at best, chances of ruffing a in dummy without promotion are great, the problem is getting a double promotion, but if you can smell that North has more than 3 then I guess the ruff try is better line.
0

#8 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 17:50

Oh. Ok.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#9 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2005-May-07, 19:56

Congradulations, you line makes the plenty of sense, but I would have started with the club hook first. Then KA. When both follow, you have 10 tricks (1+2+2+5). Now there is no reason to risk someone ruffing your club ace (of course if they do, you ruff a club for your 10th trick). Just take your tricks and smile. Should someone have 4clubs and QJ of spades, so much the better.

You will be surprised how few people will lead that last trump. Learning to do that simple thing will win you a lot of extra tricks over the years. Keep it up.

ben
--Ben--

#10 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-May-07, 23:04

Thanks <silly grin>
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users