MPs scoring, no-one vul, your call?
Page 1 of 1
Not what I was hoping to hear
#2
Posted 2018-March-13, 02:16
manudude03, on 2018-March-12, 16:51, said:
MPs scoring, no-one vul, your call?
What makes us think that our suits play better, one level higher than the one pd decided to jump to 4 level?
I think this is a clear pass at least for now, we are not doubled yet.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
Posted 2018-March-13, 03:47
Pass, if you take a call now you're just raising the contract level.
There's no assurance that your suits will play better than partners. There's also no assurance that partner has anything in your suits. If partner has solid or near solid ♥, what does that say about the likelihood opener has minor suit pieces?
If you have a hand where you can clearly see that 5 of a minor has a better chance to make, then you can think about acting. If not, sit.
There's no assurance that your suits will play better than partners. There's also no assurance that partner has anything in your suits. If partner has solid or near solid ♥, what does that say about the likelihood opener has minor suit pieces?
If you have a hand where you can clearly see that 5 of a minor has a better chance to make, then you can think about acting. If not, sit.
#5
Posted 2018-March-13, 09:08
You were not invited to this party.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#6
Posted 2018-March-13, 11:05
good luck partner
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#7
Posted 2018-March-14, 17:14
Pass without a 2nd thought.
Partner probably has some almost solid H suit and a few spades as well otherwise that would make too much for opponents. Some kind of 47xx (with 46 or 57 hed probably make another call unless extremely weak S vs. H), where clearly H will play better than my minors. And a level lower. And not Xed yet.
Yes, the sight of dummy will be a disappointment to partner, but thats not an excuse to try not to be dummy.
Partner probably has some almost solid H suit and a few spades as well otherwise that would make too much for opponents. Some kind of 47xx (with 46 or 57 hed probably make another call unless extremely weak S vs. H), where clearly H will play better than my minors. And a level lower. And not Xed yet.
Yes, the sight of dummy will be a disappointment to partner, but thats not an excuse to try not to be dummy.
#9
Posted 2018-March-14, 22:32
manudude03, on 2018-March-12, 16:51, said:
https://www.youtube....h?v=2JCxU2loO5w
Even if a minor would play better than 4♥, there is no way of asking partner to choose.
#10
Posted 2018-March-15, 06:02
FINALLY we get dealt a hand with enough intrigue to look interesting. One that allows us to shake off the dust from our thinking cap after what seems like an endless barrage of overly simple hand constructs. Lho opens a weak NT which does nothing to dampen our enthusiasm and we anxiously await our turn when p bids 4h. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr this takes almost all of the fun out of this hand. At least 4h has a chance of having won the bidding (making or not) since it looks like the opps have been robbed out of playing a probable 9+ card spade fit. So with one last wistful look at what might have been we casually reach out to the bidding box and with a small tear rolling down our cheek the
PASS
card softly lands on the table. Is it really wrong to hope against hope 4h will get axed by the weak NT opener
?
PASS
card softly lands on the table. Is it really wrong to hope against hope 4h will get axed by the weak NT opener

#11
Posted 2018-March-15, 09:45
The first rule of holes: When you are in one, STOP DIGGING
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#12
Posted 2018-March-15, 12:09
Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. Yes I did pass with that hand. The actual layout wasn't exactly to be expected though. Let's just say LHO had a 3♠4♥3♦3♠ hand and didn't notice until play started.
Wayne Somerville
Page 1 of 1
MPs scoring, no-one vul, your call?