BBO Discussion Forums: Negative x - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Negative x Reopening when a negative x is not bid

#1 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2005-April-18, 19:22

I am quite insecure about autions like this
1X- 2Y - p - p
? - p - ?

Im am going from the following definition, which is from the Danish beginner system Bridgevejen(4 card major acol like system), taught to most beginners in Denmark:

When I choose not to a bid a negative x, I *expect* opener to reopen with an x! Opener could choose not to x if:
1) she has length in the bid suit
2) or she has a hand not suitable for defense (bid a suit)

How do you like this definition?
Would pickup partners on BBO play by this?
Any good links to texts on negative bids for beginners in SAYC?

Thanks
0

#2 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-April-19, 02:12

Excellent treatment. Opener should always reopen if short in the suit overcalled, unless, as you point out, her hand has no defence and doesn't want to sit for a penalty if partner passes. Something like

KQJ976
4
KJ954
7

1 (2) pass pass
2

It's quite likely that partner has a penalty of 2, but you don't want to cooperate and rebid 2. That is a warning against defending, and partner must remember.

This hand will obviously pass:

KQ1054
AJ4
K84
108

Partner can't have a trap pass.

I think this treatment is universal and has little, if anything, to do with the system you play.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,986
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-April-19, 02:47

Hi,

I agree with Roland, but would weaken his example hand a
little bit further, i.e. I would also pass with

KQ1054
AJ
K84
108x

In other words, opener should always look very hard at his holding
in the overcalled suit, and ask himself, can partner have a trap pass,
or is he just weak. (*)

Even a holding like Kx in the overcalled suit would be an
indicator not to reopen, at least playing IMP's.

This gets more important if, the overcalled suit is spade, i.e.

1H - (2S) - (Pass) - (Pass)
???

because now, you dont have the possibility to play on the 2 level.

With kind regards
Marlowe

(*) Knowing your opponents helps of course more, if they are regular
overcalling on crap, you should reopen with a holding like AJ in their suit.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2005-April-19, 12:04

Walddk, on Apr 19 2005, 08:12 AM, said:

Something like

KQJ976
4
KJ954
7

1 (2) pass pass
2

It's quite likely that partner has a penalty of 2, but you don't want to cooperate and rebid 2. That is a warning against defending, and partner must remember.

Whatever you consider partner's hand to be, I doubt it is correct to make an insufficient bid. :blink:

Eric
0

#5 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-April-20, 00:00

EricK, on Apr 19 2005, 01:04 PM, said:

Whatever you consider partner's hand to be, I doubt it is correct to make an insufficient bid. :P

Eric

OK then, 2 is certainly best under the circumstances, but let's change it to 2 :blink:

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users