BBO Discussion Forums: Is this the Gib's way of thinking? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is this the Gib's way of thinking?

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2017-March-01, 02:41



3= 12 TPs
3= 13+TPs
So 12 + 13 = 25 = game
0

#2 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2017-March-01, 05:14

Well, it was going to make until declarer unnecessarily ruffed a spade... I don't see the point of 3S rather than a direct 4H (though 3H only promises 4 for some reason), but it's not outrageous to bid game with West after 3H.

ahydra
0

#3 User is online   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,866
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2017-March-01, 08:29

View Postlycier, on 2017-March-01, 02:41, said:

3= 12 TPs
3= 13+TPs
So 12 + 13 = 25 = game


On this hand, the math adds up.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users