I have no way to understand why both of 2♦ and 2N can promise to force to game.
A non-forcing sequence or a forcing one?
#1
Posted 2016-August-30, 04:16
I have no way to understand why both of 2♦ and 2N can promise to force to game.
#2
Posted 2016-August-30, 06:12
#3
Posted 2016-August-30, 10:37
manudude03, on 2016-August-30, 06:12, said:
Very true. And an easy one to answer, cannot possibly be forcing to game. The question is whether it should even be a one-round force.
#4
Posted 2016-August-30, 20:11
iandayre, on 2016-August-30, 10:37, said:
I think it has to be, unless you have a gadget.
#6
Posted 2016-August-31, 12:11
#7
Posted 2016-August-31, 16:26
johnu, on 2016-August-31, 09:00, said:
jdonn, on 2016-August-31, 12:11, said:
Other than drury or a few specific instances, GIB doesn't know to change its system by a passed hand.
Totally agree with you.
Your replies are convincing.
This post has been edited by diana_eva: 2016-September-03, 15:14
Reason for edit: Fixed quote
#8
Posted 2016-September-02, 15:43