http://i.imgur.com/hEPP64A.png
Ignore the current hand, look over at the my results. It didn't happen on my table but I noticed tons of them just went straight to 7♣ without even checking if it had all the keycards. It could have used blackwood or something, but it just jumped to 7.
Page 1 of 1
Grand slam missing an A
#2
Posted 2016-April-11, 21:50
AyunuS, on 2016-April-11, 18:13, said:
http://i.imgur.com/hEPP64A.png
Ignore the current hand, look over at the my results. It didn't happen on my table but I noticed tons of them just went straight to 7♣ without even checking if it had all the keycards. It could have used blackwood or something, but it just jumped to 7.
Ignore the current hand, look over at the my results. It didn't happen on my table but I noticed tons of them just went straight to 7♣ without even checking if it had all the keycards. It could have used blackwood or something, but it just jumped to 7.
Hello
You are great - good hand and good topic.
First, let's see the traveller of the 16 hands :
Second, let's see related hands :
1- Your hand
Result: 6♣E=
2- I checked it :
Result: 7♣E-1
3- One classic hand with 7♣ :
Result : 7♣E-1
Hand statistics :
1- There are 17 hands in total
2- There are 4 hands with 6♣ as a final contract.They have same bidding sequences.
3- There are 13 hands with 7♣ as a final contract.They have same bidding sequences.
The conclusion :
1- For basic Gibs, I think it is a bug. I have no opinion.
2- For advanced Gibs, I have no conclusion since I don't know who are users of advanced Gibs in the 12 hands with 7♣ contract. I only know you are a user of advanced Gib.
3- Assume other 12 hands plus my hand with 7♣ contract played only by basic Gibs, it shows basic Gibs are buggy, advanced Gibs are good indeed. This is a normal matter, no surprising.
For Gib programming, I am a layman. It would be appreciated if Stephen Tu would answer this question.
Page 1 of 1