EBU
In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.
Page 1 of 1
Teams of Four problem
#2
Posted 2015-October-31, 09:46
kb49, on 2015-October-31, 09:05, said:
In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.
Multiple teams: AVE+ to both sides, +3 IMP to both teams; Law 12C2
Knockout teams: flat; EBU White Book, 8.90.3(e)
(In principal Law 86D could apply.)
Robin
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
#3
Posted 2015-October-31, 09:51
kb49, on 2015-October-31, 09:05, said:
EBU
In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.
In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.
Unless you have specific regulations for the situation (and I don't know the EBU regulations) the board is cancelled and an artificial score is assigned on this board to each team, both of which in no way at fault. See Law 12C2.
Page 1 of 1