BBO Discussion Forums: switch to what? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

switch to what?

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2014-September-01, 00:32

x
AQT8x
Kxx
JT8x

We open light but I decide to pass in 1st, favourable@MP's.

It goes:

p-1S-p-2S
3H-4H-p-4S
end

Partner dutifully leads the 2 of hearts and dummy mentions how useless her hand suddenly became:

Jxxx
KJxx
9xx
Q7

the T wins, declarer showing up with the singleton 7 of hearts. What should I switch to?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-September-01, 11:12

This is hard, as there are many scenarios. Overall diamond seems like the play, though a trump might work better.
0

#3 User is offline   PhantomSac 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,488
  • Joined: 2006-March-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-September-02, 00:36

View Postwhereagles, on 2014-September-01, 11:12, said:

This is hard, as there are many scenarios. Overall diamond seems like the play, though a trump might work better.


A trump is never necessary and is a horrible play, if declarer is 5143 then diamonds are 3-3 so he only needs one ruff, if declarer is 5134 then he again only needs one ruff.

The question is whether to play a club or a diamond. I want to play a diamond instinctively, if declarer has say AKQxxx x AJx Axx or similar a diamond is necessary to beat the hand (before he pitches a diamond on a club). If declarer is 6142 with Ax of clubs we need to play a club to (AKQxx x AJxx Ax) before the club goes away on the diamond. I'm sure I'd play a diamond, we have added chances like AKQxxx x Qxx AKx where it's right. And with 6-4 perhaps declarer would have bid 4D. But it's not like this play is guaranteed to work and I'm not sure it's the right one heh. Instinct one time!
The artist formerly known as jlall
1

#4 User is offline   kuhchung 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 729
  • Joined: 2010-August-03

Posted 2014-September-02, 12:44

i would've returned a diamond without any of the thought process
Videos of the worst bridge player ever playing bridge:
https://www.youtube....hungPlaysBridge
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2014-September-02, 15:14

I was about to return a diamond without the thought process but then I started the thought process and returned the J (playing declarer to be 5152 I think). Declarer had

AQJTx x AJx AK9x

and should have made it now but did believe I helped her that much I guess and didn't take the club finesse and drifted 1 off.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users