BBO Discussion Forums: Bid after unusual nt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bid after unusual nt

#21 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2014-August-16, 14:47

Don't know why people want to introduce ♠ at the 3-level. you have a ♥ fit best take the sure fit.

the consensus is 3♠ is forcing, I don't think this hand is good enough to force.

I would give up penalty double for a hand that INV opposite an above avg 2N (you decide just hearts or for unspecified suit)



Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#22 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,696
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2014-August-16, 16:07

View Poststeve2005, on 2014-August-16, 14:47, said:

the consensus is 3♠ is forcing, I don't think this hand is good enough to force.

That "consensus" is certain to change after PS's post...
(-: Zel :-)
1

#23 User is offline   jdgalt 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 87
  • Joined: 2007-July-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:northern California
  • Interests:Also a board game player (I'm "jdgalt" on BoardGameGeek, too).

Posted 2014-August-16, 16:28

Partner is roughly 1=5=5=2, but has less than an opening hand. I'll try 4H at IMPs or non-vulnerable. If we're vul at pairs I'd rather defend 3NT or 5C.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users