+200 for defending 3♠ undoubled was a pretty common result, but obviously EW could have done better. Any blame, or just one of those things?
One That Got Away
#1
Posted 2012-December-14, 08:32
+200 for defending 3♠ undoubled was a pretty common result, but obviously EW could have done better. Any blame, or just one of those things?
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#2
Posted 2012-December-14, 10:06
Imo, anyone who suggests that either should do anything is a pure result merchant.
#3
Posted 2012-December-14, 12:48
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#4
Posted 2012-December-14, 13:34
#5
Posted 2012-December-14, 14:46
The only way to get to a better place would be for South to panic and bid a round suit.
Preempts work....
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#6
Posted 2012-December-14, 14:57
ArtK78, on 2012-December-14, 13:34, said:
Well he does have 3 potentially nice tens...but yeah..agreed completely and I while I am certainly aggressive competing against preempts, doubling here seems quite wrong although, of course, like any dubious action on hands like this, could work out but seems quite anti-percentage.
#7
Posted 2012-December-14, 15:13
- billw55
#8
Posted 2012-December-14, 15:19
#9
Posted 2012-December-15, 02:32
West knows that at most South has only 1 ♠. As such, South has to have a monster to make any move over 3 ♠. So South is still capable of having a lot more than was actually held.
Double in the pass out seat would be takeout. Bidding 4 ♦ on a 6 card broken suit with red pockets is a complete shot in the dark. You might make 130, but you'll also frequently pickup -200, -500, or -800.
The only sane course is for West to pass and let North/South struggle.
#10
Posted 2012-December-15, 03:06
#11
Posted 2012-December-15, 08:37
Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
#12
Posted 2012-December-15, 09:07
daveharty, on 2012-December-15, 08:37, said:
Do they have a misunderstanding about the hesitation in the 4♦ overcall?
#13
Posted 2012-December-16, 03:07
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft

Help
