Help
Does
1♦- 1♠
2♦- 3♣
4♣ - 5♠
feel like it misrepresents the value or key question left on this hand?
If partner returns to 6♣, you can offer 6♦.
Partner should not take 3♣ as natural in this auction initially (see 3rd suit forcing p55-56).
Also BWS 2001 states:
After a one-level suit response and openers simple same-suit rebid:
(a) a third-suit bid that is a reverse or a three-level bid is forcing to game;
I've boxed myself in here
#41
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,168
- Joined: 2012-May-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
- Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge
Posted 2012-May-22, 23:14
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#42
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 581
- Joined: 2012-January-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sweden
- Interests:Bridge...some other things too I suppose.
Posted 2012-May-24, 15:55
SJS...
1♦-2♠
3♦-4♣*
5♥*-5♠*
Not sure after this...King ? is pointless, and partner assumes we may not have much support to spades...easy 7♦ or a gut instinct 7♠, no regrets...
1♦-2♠
3♦-4♣*
5♥*-5♠*
Not sure after this...King ? is pointless, and partner assumes we may not have much support to spades...easy 7♦ or a gut instinct 7♠, no regrets...
♠♥♦♣ The American Swede of BBF...I eat my meatballs with blueberries, okay? ♣♦♥♠
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#43
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,560
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2012-December-19, 00:30
bump "3rd suit forcing"
I need to revisit this
I need to revisit this
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#44
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,206
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2012-December-19, 04:17
jillybean, on 2012-December-19, 00:30, said:
bump "3rd suit forcing"
I need to revisit this
I need to revisit this
We play a home hashed version of a bourke relay that seems to work, along with a slightly odd SJS.
Our version in cut down form.
1♦-2♠ = old fashioned single suited rock crusher or (H=AKQ) HHxxx or better in my suit and Hxxx or better in yours, GF.
1♦-1♠-2♦-2♠ highly constructive NF
1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥ relay for most hands inv or better
1♦-1♠-2♦-2N inv NF, 4 hearts, to show a good hand with 5♦/4♥ bid 2♥ then 3♥, to invite in NT go via 2♥
We rarely play 2N over 1♦-?-2♦, 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥-2N also shows hearts the way we play.
Another thing to discuss is what is 1♦-1♠-2♦-3♠ which if you play this sort of relay I quite like as 6♠/3♦ slam invite.
#45
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 553
- Joined: 2004-March-29
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
Posted 2012-December-20, 07:36
jillybean, on 2012-May-15, 07:52, said:
No scroing, we were bidding some hands on the partnership bidding table.
Partner could have supported ♠'s over 3♣ but it brought up an intersting problem anyway.
Which is better in this sequence 1♦ 1♠ 2♦ 3♣* nmf or 2♥ Bourke relay?
(edit after reading the post above) Why is Bourke relay better? If I have spades and hearts I won't show that until the 4level.
I agree 3♦/2♦ should be nf.
If you had SJS available, would you have used it on this hand?
Partner could have supported ♠'s over 3♣ but it brought up an intersting problem anyway.
Which is better in this sequence 1♦ 1♠ 2♦ 3♣* nmf or 2♥ Bourke relay?
(edit after reading the post above) Why is Bourke relay better? If I have spades and hearts I won't show that until the 4level.
I agree 3♦/2♦ should be nf.
If you had SJS available, would you have used it on this hand?
- Play 3SF/Bourke Relay. Then you never have a problem after 1m-1M-2m.
- The North hand has 3 possible rebids: 2♣, 2♦ or 2♠. He chose the worst. I prefer 2♣.
- The opponents have 11 hearts between them. Were they asleep?
Steven
#46
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,247
- Joined: 2010-October-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Texas
Posted 2012-December-20, 07:57
lowerline, on 2012-December-20, 07:36, said:
- Play 3SF/Bourke Relay. Then you never have a problem after 1m-1M-2m.
- The North hand has 3 possible rebids: 2♣, 2♦ or 2♠. He chose the worst. I prefer 2♣.
- The opponents have 11 hearts between them. Were they asleep?
Steven
The Bourke Relay [ cheapest bid new suit ( artificial ) forcing -- 2H! here ] was mentioned early -- at least 3 times in posts # 8 , # 14, and # 18 ... as a most effective way of how to force after a Opener's rebid of his/her minor [ similar to NMF after a 1NT rebid ].
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#47
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,206
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2012-December-20, 08:38
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2012-December-20, 07:57, said:
The Bourke Relay [ cheapest bid new suit ( artificial ) forcing -- 2H! here ] was mentioned early -- at least 3 times in posts # 8 , # 14, and # 18 ... as a most effective way of how to force after a Opener's rebid of his/her minor [ similar to NMF after a 1NT rebid ].
We actually use the next suit up even if it's been bid, 1♦-1♥-2♦-2♥ is relay rather than 2♠, you bid 2N as the cheapest bid in the relay suit.
#48
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 553
- Joined: 2004-March-29
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
Posted 2012-December-20, 09:15
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2012-December-20, 07:57, said:
The Bourke Relay [ cheapest bid new suit ( artificial ) forcing -- 2H! here ] was mentioned early -- at least 3 times in posts # 8 , # 14, and # 18 ... as a most effective way of how to force after a Opener's rebid of his/her minor [ similar to NMF after a 1NT rebid ].
Thank you for pointing out to me that others share my view on this.
Steven
#49
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,399
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:Odense, Denmark
- Interests:History, languages
Posted 2012-December-20, 09:31
3♠ should probably be forcing here, especially playing WJS. 2♠ would then be 7-11 or such, and weaker hands would make a WJS (or pass 2♦).
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#50
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,833
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2013-January-02, 10:09
Nice easy one here
1♦ = 10-17, 4+ diamonds, unbal
... - 1♥ = INV+ relay
1♠ = min, not 4 spades unless 4441/4450
... - 1NT = GF relay
2♣ = 4+ clubs
... - 2♦ = relay
2♥ = 5+ diamonds, 4 clubs
... - 2♠ = relay
3♥ = 3064
... - 3♠ = relay
4♣ = 3 controls
... - 4♦ = relay
5♦ = controls in diamonds, spades and clubs, 2 of top 3 in diamonds, only 1 of top 3 in clubs
... - 7♠
1♦ = 10-17, 4+ diamonds, unbal
... - 1♥ = INV+ relay
1♠ = min, not 4 spades unless 4441/4450
... - 1NT = GF relay
2♣ = 4+ clubs
... - 2♦ = relay
2♥ = 5+ diamonds, 4 clubs
... - 2♠ = relay
3♥ = 3064
... - 3♠ = relay
4♣ = 3 controls
... - 4♦ = relay
5♦ = controls in diamonds, spades and clubs, 2 of top 3 in diamonds, only 1 of top 3 in clubs
... - 7♠
(-: Zel :-)