dropped Stayman
#2
Posted 2011-February-18, 17:34
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2011-February-18, 17:43
#5
Posted 2011-February-18, 18:40
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#6
Posted 2011-February-18, 18:54
#8
Posted 2011-February-18, 19:19
Hate Stayman - why am I trying to play in 2NT (or 3NT!) with this soft 6 count opposite a 15-17 NT?
#9
Posted 2011-February-19, 04:27
West: This hand doesn't have a rebid after partner's likely 2♠ rebid. Stayman was NOT a good idea.
As others said, N/S were not at fault *g
#10
Posted 2011-February-19, 06:42
#11
Posted 2011-February-19, 08:50
With regard to East I have some sympathy for his choice third in hand. These bids can backfire of course, but you do not win by always making the book bid. I like players who know the book bid, but also know when to deviate from them. Besides opening 1♣ will create rebid problems most of the time and anyway what is so terrible about 2♦? You are not down yet.
I also beg to differ from Gerben. This hand is not in the 18-19 HCP notrump category. Sure you have playing tricks, but the opponents have the opening lead.
Note, that the 1NT opening has kept opponents out of their nine card ♠ fit, where they might make game if the cards lie not too unfavorable for them.
Rainer Herrmann
#13
Posted 2011-February-19, 13:06
rhm, on 2011-February-19, 08:50, said:
Rainer Herrmann
I think 3NT would score better and probably as good a chance or better than 2D.
#14
Posted 2011-February-19, 20:55
Bbradley62, on 2011-February-18, 17:41, said:
Sorry, I know my humor doesn't contribute much...
1N is pretty bad. I would open 1♣ and rebid 2N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#16
Posted 2011-February-20, 16:16
Phil, on 2011-February-19, 20:55, said:
1N is pretty bad. I would open 1♣ and rebid 2N.
So holding ♠AQ7♥82♦J6♣AKQJ74 you would bid 2NT after
1♣--1♦ with 82 in ♥ ?
1♣--1♥ with J6 in ♦ maybe just barely acceptable.
1♣--1♠ with 82 in ♥ and J6 in ♦ ?
I think your humor does contribute. It is a funny one.
Sorry I prefer a 1NT opening to this bidding. You have 2 low doubleton where you will need help from partner to be successful and 15-17 is about right on strength. You will normally need more than 6-7 random HCP to make 3NT. This can easily be proven by a simulation.
It is just the severe rebid problems after 1♣, which makes the 1NT opening acceptable in my opinion. A 1NT opening will also make it much easier to reach ♠ and the right level when partner holds 5 mediocre cards in ♠.
Rainer Herrmann
#18
Posted 2011-February-20, 16:31
#19
Posted 2011-February-20, 16:49
aguahombre, on 2011-February-20, 16:31, said:
Maybe, but if you jump to 3♣, you can easily miss 4♠ when partner is weak with ♠ and no direct raise would be right over 1♠. That is where a 1NT opening would score.
Rainer Herrmann
#20
Posted 2011-February-20, 16:56
Bbradley62, on 2011-February-20, 16:29, said:
And what do you do over 1♠?
If I opened 1♣ I would rather jump raise ♠ than jump rebid ♣.
But some would consider this heresy and most would not play a 3NT rebid by partner as natural over a jump raise.
Rainer Herrmann

Help
