MP, V=N
your bid
#1
Posted 2010-December-10, 17:43
MP, V=N
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#2
Posted 2010-December-10, 18:46
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-December-10, 18:52
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2010-December-10, 18:53
#5
Posted 2010-December-11, 03:56
I can show a heart stopper later if partner wants to know.
Maybe at MPs 2NT has more going for it (than at IMPs) but I still feel an obligation to tell partner we have a fit.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#7
Posted 2010-December-11, 17:02
#8
Posted 2010-December-11, 17:50
#9
Posted 2010-December-11, 19:05
#10
Posted 2010-December-11, 20:48
jillybean, on 2010-December-10, 17:43, said:
MP, V=N
it is MP and doesn't hurt to be conservative in these positions so 1NT is fine
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#11
Posted 2010-December-12, 01:14
pooltuna, on 2010-December-11, 20:48, said:
So playing 1Nt and making 9 tricks is a good MP score?
#12
Posted 2010-December-12, 03:27
Raising diamonds seems really off.
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2010-December-12, 12:34
#14
Posted 2010-December-13, 07:05
#15
Posted 2010-December-13, 13:37
Cascade, on 2010-December-11, 03:56, said:
I can show a heart stopper later if partner wants to know.
Maybe at MPs 2NT has more going for it (than at IMPs) but I still feel an obligation to tell partner we have a fit.
I don't see the upside to this, and the downside is clear.
If we can make (and should be in) 5♦ (or more) then surely she will do something over 2N other than bid 3N?
But there will be hands on which over 2♥ she has little choice but to bid 3♦ and now here are we? Hoping to make 130 to beat the 120s? or overbidding to 3N? This soft flat hand doesn't look like 10 tricks in diamonds on hands on which she'd pass 2N.
Move one of the small diamonds into spades, and this would be a wtp? 2N. The 4th diamond, and the shorter spades, don't add up to a reason to expect diamonds to play 2 tricks better than notrump when we are aiming for a partial. And 2N is the quickest route to what rates to be the best game, or the best partial, and doesn't rule out bigger and better things when partner has an unusual hand.

Help
