opponents double partner
#2
Posted 2010-November-22, 16:11
#3
Posted 2010-November-22, 17:20
Gerben42, on 2010-November-22, 16:11, said:
Reminds me of one of my first posts where the auction went:
1♦ - (dbl) - 1♠ - (dbl)
AP
I was the 1♠ bidder with J9xxx and the 2nd double was penalty. Partner held a 0463 (I think) and gasped as he put down dummy, "I never thought you'd pass"! Fortunately I wrapped up +160 when the rest of the field was +150 lol.
Back to the hand - I think the opposite. Passing is gambling partner has enough interiors in the spade suit. In my experience an opponent who doubles after his partner preempts has trump. We don't. We could have three better strains than spades, and I think we do.
I bid 3N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2010-November-22, 17:21
3♠x is also game, but RHO seems to think it's not making, and nothing about my hand suggests that he's wrong.
3NT.
#5
Posted 2010-November-22, 18:04
In many situations, a double of our contract will carry with it the inference that doubler is prepared to double whatever we run to, but that isn't the situation here.
RHO is quite likely looking at a spade suit such that he 'knows' we aren't going to end up in 4♠. he is certainly looking at a heart suit that he doesn't want partner leading. So doubling 3♠ is not going to be because he expects to defend spades....it's because he wants a spade lead against anything I declare. A double might look like KQJ9xx x Kx xxx or the like.
Now, there will be times when partner has stretched and RHO will double whatever moves, but, even allowing for the detrimental effect of a spade lead, that can hardly lead to a worse result than passing.
#6
Posted 2010-November-22, 18:06
#7
Posted 2010-November-23, 01:14
#8
Posted 2010-November-23, 01:25
Pass should show the willingness to play 3SX, and 3S does only promises 5 good cards,
so lets play NT, and maybe we can than the opponents for telling us something about
the distribution.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2010-November-23, 07:38
#11
Posted 2010-November-24, 08:44
I held
AKQxx
J9
Q10xx
xx
I didn't know if I should bid 4♦ or not, in the need I missguessed, managed to escape losing only 3 spades and 2 clubs, but still 13 under versus +600 in 3NT
#12
Posted 2010-November-24, 09:34
mikeh, on 2010-November-22, 18:04, said:
In many situations, a double of our contract will carry with it the inference that doubler is prepared to double whatever we run to, but that isn't the situation here.
RHO is quite likely looking at a spade suit such that he 'knows' we aren't going to end up in 4♠. he is certainly looking at a heart suit that he doesn't want partner leading. So doubling 3♠ is not going to be because he expects to defend spades....it's because he wants a spade lead against anything I declare. A double might look like KQJ9xx x Kx xxx or the like.
Now, there will be times when partner has stretched and RHO will double whatever moves, but, even allowing for the detrimental effect of a spade lead, that can hardly lead to a worse result than passing.
Exactly right imo.
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2010-November-26, 01:00
#14
Posted 2010-December-01, 01:47
gnasher, on 2010-November-22, 17:21, said:
3♠x is also game, but RHO seems to think it's not making, and nothing about my hand suggests that he's wrong.
3NT.
I agree 100%

Help
