I have no problems of making "mastermind bids" that bypass a 4M for tacticals reasons but none of the hands qualify here. XX on the 3rd is gross.
Strong Opinions?
#21
Posted 2010-August-24, 12:06
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#22
Posted 2010-August-24, 12:11
I agree, entirely, with what Justin wrote.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#23
Posted 2010-August-24, 14:51
2♣ on the first, whatever you would do without the double on the other two. Even suggesting redouble is horrible.
On the first one, it's harder to get back to clubs if you bid 1♠ than it is to get to spades if you raise clubs. If we have a spade game partner can just bid spades. Or my raise may enable him to compete with 3♣ over 2♦/♥ when he would have to pass if I responded 1♠.
On the first one, it's harder to get back to clubs if you bid 1♠ than it is to get to spades if you raise clubs. If we have a spade game partner can just bid spades. Or my raise may enable him to compete with 3♣ over 2♦/♥ when he would have to pass if I responded 1♠.
#24
Posted 2010-August-24, 15:21
Pass all. Next round I'll have better idea if/what to bid.
Nice to have a partner to trust!!
Nice to have a partner to trust!!
#25
Posted 2010-August-24, 17:10
dake50, on Aug 24 2010, 03:21 PM, said:
Pass all. Next round I'll have better idea if/what to bid.
must be nice not to need a partner.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)

Help
