BBO Discussion Forums: Club MPs, your call - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Club MPs, your call

#21 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-August-16, 15:59

JLOGIC, on Aug 16 2010, 03:24 PM, said:

madness

I thought it would be crazy to balance with a 3C bid. We made a little bet, I said "no expert would bid 3C" he said at least half of experts would bid 3C".

Somebody in this thread commented on the level of our opponents. They were as good as we were.

I want to win this bet, there is $1 at the stake!
0

#22 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2010-August-16, 16:11

I made quick survey between some friends, who are quite good players.
No sympathy for 3 vulnerable there. Nonvul some of them would be tempted.
That being said I think if you choose the best player among posters here you will get higher standards than those in m poll.

I still like 3 but I agree it's risky. It's probably inferior option against people who often raise with 3 card support and for sure if we are playing with a partner who likes to "pre balance".
0

#23 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-August-16, 16:14

Spend your dollar wisely, Peachy
OK
bed
0

#24 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-August-16, 16:43

I think it is more likely the Opps only have seven trumps, than us having a favorable outcome venturing into the auction now. Am eliminating all the hands where my expert partner would have already pulled a non-green card.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#25 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-August-16, 20:45

bluecalm, on Aug 16 2010, 05:11 PM, said:

I made quick survey between some friends, who are quite good players.
No sympathy for 3 vulnerable there. Nonvul some of them would be tempted.
That being said I think if you choose the best player among posters here you will get higher standards than those in m poll.

I still like 3 but I agree it's risky. It's probably inferior option against people who often raise with 3 card support and for sure if we are playing with a partner who likes to "pre balance".

In case it matters, we both are completely aware of the need to prebalance - and do - with short in their spades and our expected share of values ans shape, after (1D)P(1S)P(2S) -
0

#26 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-August-16, 22:12

I now have the hand record instead of posting the hand from memory, and I promised to correct the originally posted facts as follows:

The hand with all spots was the following:
AK106
J8
109
Q9873

It was East and East was dealer. Vul was correct - EW Vul, NS notvul
Correct auction:
P (1D) P (1S)
P (2S) P P your turn.

Let me know if this correction affects your action, balance or not.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users